How Reinsurance Works and Its Importance

Reinsurance is a vital tool for insurance companies to manage their risks and ensure they have enough capital to pay out claims. This is because reinsurers take on some of the risk of an insurance company's policies, allowing them to reinsure their policies and reduce their exposure.

Reinsurance contracts are typically negotiated between the insurance company and the reinsurer, and they specify the terms of the agreement, including the amount of risk being transferred and the premium to be paid. The reinsurer then pays a portion of the claims made on the policies to the insurance company.

In return for taking on this risk, the reinsurer charges a premium to the insurance company, which is usually a percentage of the original premium paid by the policyholder. This premium is what allows the reinsurer to make a profit and cover their own expenses.

Reinsurance is essential for insurance companies to operate and provide coverage to policyholders.

For more insights, see: Reinsurance Companies Florida

Reinsurance allows insurers to issue policies with higher limits than usual, essentially taking on more risk by transferring some of it to the reinsurer. This enables them to offer more comprehensive coverage to their clients.

With reinsurance, insurers can also manage their risk more effectively, which is especially important for businesses that operate in high-risk industries. By transferring some of the risk, they can reduce their exposure and focus on other areas of their business.

The ability to transfer risk is a key benefit of reinsurance, making it an attractive option for insurers who want to take on more risk and offer more comprehensive coverage to their clients.

Reinsurance enables carriers to expand their underwriting capacity by offering higher policy limits or by entering additional markets with higher risk.

Reinsurance promotes financial stability by limiting the impact of large claims, making loss costs more predictable and manageable.

Carriers can extend the benefits of coverage at more affordable rates to more policyholders by leveraging reinsurance to reduce retained risks.

Reinsurance often comes at a high cost to insurers, making it a challenge to source an affordable policy.

For cautious insurers, the answer to whether a given risk justifies the expense of reinsurance is usually yes, especially when it comes to managing retained risks.

On a global scale, reinsurance distributes risk across regions and markets, enabling the insurance industry to better manage major disasters, including natural disasters.

Reinsurance provides added protection to the overall insurance industry, enabling carriers to manage significant risks while maintaining financial stability.

On a risks attaching basis, the insurer knows there is coverage during the whole policy period even if claims are only discovered or made later on.

All claims from cedent underlying policies incepting during the period of the reinsurance contract are covered even if they occur after the expiration date of the reinsurance contract.

Claims from cedent underlying policies incepting outside the period of the reinsurance contract are not covered, regardless of when they occur.

This means that if you're on a risks attaching basis, you can feel secure knowing that all claims from policies that started during the reinsurance contract period are covered, even if they're reported after the contract has ended.

Discover more: Contract and Risk Management

Surplus relief is a key benefit of proportional treaties. These types of treaties provide the cedent with the capacity to write more business and/or at larger limits.

This means that the cedent can take on more risk and potentially earn more revenue.

The ability to write more business and/or at larger limits is a direct result of the surplus relief provided by proportional treaties.

Recommended read: Risk Management in Insurance Business

Reinsurance is categorized into two main forms: treaty and facultative. Treaty reinsurance covers a broad portfolio of policies under an agreement that automatically includes qualifying risks, such as all residential property policies within a region.

Treaty reinsurance is typically a long-term arrangement between carriers and reinsurers, whereas facultative reinsurance is negotiated on a case-by-case basis for individual high-value or unusual risks. Facultative reinsurance is often used to underwrite projects or assets with complex or unique risk profiles, such as major infrastructure developments.

Both treaty and facultative reinsurance can be structured as proportional or non-proportional. Proportional reinsurance involves the reinsurer taking a stated percentage share of each policy, whereas non-proportional reinsurance involves the reinsurer only paying out if the total claim(s) exceed a stated amount.

Suggestion: Non Standard Auto Insurance Florida

Here are the main forms of non-proportional reinsurance:

Reinsurance programs are designed to reduce an insurance company's exposure to loss by passing part of the risk to a reinsurer or a group of reinsurers.

The ultimate goal of reinsurance is to minimize the financial impact of a large loss, allowing the insurer to continue operating and serving its customers.

In non-proportional reinsurance, the reinsurer only pays out if the total claim exceeds a stated amount, known as the retention or priority.

For instance, an insurer may retain a loss up to $1 million and purchase a layer of reinsurance of $4 million in excess of this amount.

This means the insurer would bear $1 million of a $3 million loss and recover $2 million from the reinsurer.

The main forms of non-proportional reinsurance are excess of loss and stop loss, which provide different levels of protection to the insurer.

For more insights, see: Excess of Loss Reinsurance

Excess of loss reinsurance can have three forms: Per Risk XL, Per Occurrence or Per Event XL, and Aggregate XL, each offering unique benefits to the insurer.

In Per Risk XL, the insurer's policy limits are greater than the reinsurance retention, allowing the reinsurer to cover losses above a certain threshold.

For example, an insurer might insure commercial property risks with policy limits up to $10 million and buy Per Risk reinsurance of $5 million in excess of $5 million.

This would result in the reinsurer covering a $1 million loss on a policy with a $6 million total loss.

Catastrophe excess of loss reinsurance protects the insurer against catastrophic events that involve multiple policies, often with large losses.

For instance, an insurer might issue homeowners' policies with limits of up to $500,000 and buy catastrophe reinsurance of $22,000,000 in excess of $3,000,000.

This would provide protection against multiple policy losses in one event, such as a hurricane or earthquake.

Aggregate XL provides frequency protection to the reinsured, covering multiple losses within a specified period.

For example, an insurer might retain $1 million net any one vessel and buy Aggregate XL of $5 million annual aggregate limit in excess of $5m annual aggregate deductible.

Worth a look: Loan Loss Reserve Accounting

There are two main types of reinsurance: treaty and facultative. Treaty reinsurance covers a broad portfolio of policies under an agreement that automatically includes qualifying risks, while facultative reinsurance is negotiated on a case-by-case basis for individual high-value or unusual risks.

Treaty reinsurance is typically a long-term arrangement between carriers and reinsurers, covering all residential property policies within a region, or an insurer's entire book of business. Facultative reinsurance, on the other hand, is usually an isolated transaction, a one-off agreement in which the reinsurer holds greater autonomy in their decision to take on a specific risk.

Both treaty and facultative reinsurance can be structured as proportional or non-proportional. Proportional reinsurance involves sharing premiums and losses between insurer and reinsurer in a set ratio, while non-proportional reinsurance involves the reinsurer paying out only if the total claim exceeds a stated amount.

Proportional reinsurance can be quota share or surplus reinsurance, or a combination of the two. Quota share involves reinsuring a fixed percentage of each insurance policy, while surplus reinsurance involves the ceding company retaining a certain amount of each risk and reinsuring the excess.

If this caught your attention, see: Facultative vs Treaty Reinsurance

Facultative reinsurance, on the other hand, can be written on either a proportional or excess of loss basis. It's commonly used for large or unusual risks that don't fit within standard reinsurance treaties due to their exclusions.

Here are some key differences between proportional and non-proportional reinsurance:

In non-proportional reinsurance, the reinsurer's liability will usually cover the whole lifetime of the original insurance, but the question arises of when either party can choose to cease the reinsurance in respect of future new business. Reinsurance treaties can either be written on a "continuous" or "term" basis, with a continuous contract having no predetermined end date but either party can give 90 days notice to cancel or amend the treaty for new business.

The Losses Occurring Basis is a type of reinsurance treaty that covers all claims occurring during the period of the contract, irrespective of when the underlying policies incepted.

This means that insurance coverage is provided for losses happening in the defined period, which is the usual basis of cover for short tail business.

Claims from cedent underlying policies incepting outside the period of the reinsurance contract are not covered even if they occur during the period of the reinsurance contract.

Any losses occurring after the contract expiration date are not covered under this basis.

This type of reinsurance is often used for short tail business, which includes insurance policies with a short duration or limited exposure to risk.

A different take: Tail Value at Risk

Fronting is a type of reinsurance where the ceding company presents the reinsurer with a distorted picture of their risk profile. This can lead to unfair settlements.

A reinsurer may front if they underestimate the risk or overestimate the potential return. They might also do it to gain a competitive edge.

In fronting, the reinsurer may agree to take on more risk than they can handle, which can result in financial difficulties.