Excess of Loss Reinsurance Explained

Excess of loss reinsurance is a type of insurance that helps companies manage their risk by transferring a portion of their losses to a reinsurer.

The excess of loss reinsurance policy specifies the amount of losses that the company must cover before the reinsurer takes over, known as the retention amount.

This retention amount can be a fixed dollar amount or a percentage of the total losses.

The reinsurer will then cover any losses above the retention amount, up to a predetermined limit.

A different take: Reinsurance Companies Florida

Excess of loss reinsurance is a type of reinsurance that helps insurers manage their risk. There are three main types: per risk, per occurrence, and aggregate.

Per risk excess of loss reinsurance covers losses that exceed a specified amount for each individual risk insured by the insurer. This type of reinsurance is useful for insurers who want to transfer risk on a per-risk basis.

Discover more: Remove Excess Coolant

Per occurrence excess of loss reinsurance is not explicitly mentioned in the article sections, but we can infer that it might be similar to per risk excess of loss reinsurance. However, the article sections do mention catastrophe excess of loss reinsurance, which provides coverage for losses resulting from a catastrophic event that affects a large number of insureds.

Aggregate excess of loss reinsurance provides coverage for the total amount of claims that exceed a predetermined threshold over a specific period, rather than on an individual risk basis. This type of reinsurance is useful for insurers who want to transfer risk on an aggregate basis.

Here are some common types of excess of loss reinsurance:

Excess of Loss Reinsurance operates on a "first-dollar" basis, meaning that the reinsurer will only cover claims that exceed a certain amount specified in the reinsurance contract.

The threshold for this coverage is known as the "retention" or "attachment point", which can vary based on the type of risk being covered and the specific needs of the insurer.

This threshold is a crucial factor in determining how Excess of Loss Reinsurance works, as it dictates when the reinsurer will step in to cover losses.

Expand your knowledge: Reinsurance Market

Proportional reinsurance is a form of reinsurance under which shares in a risk or portfolio are reinsured under the direct insurer's conditions.

The reinsurer assumes a contractually set percentage share of the written risk, making administrative expenditure very low for the reinsurer.

Premium and losses are shared proportionately on a pro-rata basis, in contrast to non-proportional reinsurance.

This means the reinsurer participates in the expenses through payment of a reinsurance commission, rather than bearing the full administrative costs.

Here's an interesting read: Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Reform Act of 2010

Non-Proportional reinsurance is a type of reinsurance treaty where the reinsurer assumes the loss expenditure in excess of a particular amount. This type of reinsurance is in contrast to proportional reinsurance, where the reinsurer shares the risk proportionately on a pro-rata basis.

In a non-proportional reinsurance treaty, the reinsurer only covers losses that exceed a certain amount, known as the priority. This is often seen in excess of loss treaties, where the reinsurer assumes the loss expenditure in excess of a particular amount.

Readers also liked: Excess vs Umbrella Insurance

Non-proportional reinsurance is often used to manage catastrophic risks, such as natural disasters or large-scale accidents. It provides a safety net for insurers by transferring the risk of large losses to the reinsurer.

Here are some key features of non-proportional reinsurance:

Silent Cyber is a type of risk that can sneak into traditional reinsurance treaties. This is known as unintended coverage of cyber-related losses.

Cyber-related losses can be a significant concern for businesses, and it's surprising how often they're not explicitly excluded from traditional reinsurance treaties. Unintended coverage of cyber-related losses in these treaties can leave reinsurers exposed to significant financial risk.

Silent Cyber can arise from the ambiguity of traditional reinsurance treaties, which may not clearly exclude cyber-related losses. This can lead to disputes and unexpected payouts.

In some cases, Silent Cyber can be more expensive than traditional cyber insurance policies, due to the lack of clarity and the resulting uncertainty.

The retention limit is the maximum amount of loss an insurer is responsible for before reinsurance coverage kicks in. This limit can be set on a per-risk, per-occurrence, or aggregate basis, depending on the type of excess of loss reinsurance contract.

The reinsurance limit is the maximum amount the reinsurer will cover for losses exceeding the insurer's retention level. This limit can be set for each risk, occurrence, or policy period, depending on the type of excess of loss reinsurance contract.

A per-risk excess of loss reinsurance contract covers the reinsurer's losses exceeding a predetermined retention level for each risk. For instance, an insurance company may have a per-risk excess of loss reinsurance contract with a $1 million retention level, and the reinsurer would cover the excess amount for each individual risk.

Per-occurrence excess of loss reinsurance provides coverage for losses stemming from a single event or occurrence, regardless of the number of individual risks involved. This type of reinsurance is often used in catastrophe insurance to protect insurers from substantial losses resulting from events such as hurricanes, earthquakes, or floods.

Here's an interesting read: Trailing Stop Limit Order vs Trailing Stop Loss

The retention ratio is the percentage share of the retention relative to the gross written premium. This ratio can help insurers understand how much of their premium is being retained and how much is being reinsured.

An aggregate excess of loss reinsurance contract covers the insurer's cumulative losses over a specific period, usually one year. For example, an insurer may have an aggregate excess of loss reinsurance contract with a $10 million retention level, and the reinsurer would cover the excess amount for the entire year.

On a similar theme: Excess Reserve Ratio

Excess of loss reinsurance contracts can be structured with multiple layers of coverage. Each layer has its own retention level and reinsurance limit.

Insurers may purchase coverage from different reinsurers for each layer to diversify their risk. This is a common practice in the industry.

Each layer of coverage has a specific reinsurance limit, which is the maximum amount that the reinsurer will pay out in the event of a loss. This limit helps to determine the level of protection for the insurer.

By structuring their reinsurance program with multiple layers of coverage, insurers can optimize their costs and reduce their exposure to major losses.

You might like: Stop Loss or Stop Limit Order

Excess of loss reinsurance contracts involve complex pricing and negotiation processes. Several factors can impact the pricing of these contracts, including historical loss experience, which can influence the reinsurer's decision to charge lower premiums to insurers with a favorable loss history.

The insurer's exposure and risk profile also play a significant role in pricing, with higher risk exposures resulting in higher premiums. A reinsurer's capacity, or willingness to assume risk, can also affect pricing, leading them to charge higher premiums if they have limited capacity.

The negotiation process for excess of loss reinsurance contracts often involves brokers and intermediaries who help insurers and reinsurers establish the terms and conditions of the contract, aiming to balance the insurer's risk management needs and the reinsurer's capacity and pricing requirements.

When it comes to pricing excess of loss reinsurance contracts, several factors come into play. The insurer's historical loss experience is a key consideration, with reinsurers looking at the insurer's past losses to determine the premium.

A favorable loss history can lead to lower premiums, making it a crucial factor in the negotiation process. Insurers with a history of low losses can often negotiate better terms.

The insurer's exposure and risk profile also impact pricing, with higher-risk exposures resulting in higher premiums. This is because reinsurers are taking on more risk when covering high-risk policies.

Reinsurers' capacity, or their willingness to assume risk, can also affect pricing. If a reinsurer has limited capacity, they may charge higher premiums or refuse to provide coverage altogether.

The negotiation process often involves brokers and intermediaries who help insurers and reinsurers reach an agreement. This process aims to balance the insurer's risk management needs with the reinsurer's capacity and pricing requirements.

Ultimately, the goal is to find a mutually acceptable price that works for both parties.

In insurance, it's essential to understand the difference between gross, retro, and net items.

Gross items make up the total amount from direct insurance policies or reinsurance treaties.

Retro items, on the other hand, are derived from own reinsurance cessions.

To calculate the net item, you simply subtract the retro amount from the gross amount.

The formula is straightforward: gross minus retro equals net.

Obligatory reinsurance is a type of reinsurance treaty where the reinsurer participates in a cedant's total, precisely defined insurance portfolio.

This is a key difference from facultative reinsurance, which is more flexible and doesn't involve a specific portfolio.

A spread loss treaty is a type of treaty between an insurer and a reinsurer that covers risks of a defined portfolio over a multi-year period.

This kind of treaty helps to spread the risk of losses over a longer period, making it more manageable for both parties involved.

In a spread loss treaty, the reinsurer agrees to cover the insurer's losses over a specified period, usually several years.

The negotiation process for excess of loss reinsurance contracts is complex and often involves multiple parties.

Brokers and intermediaries play a key role in helping insurers and reinsurers establish the terms and conditions of the contract. They facilitate communication and provide expertise to ensure a smooth negotiation process.

The goal of the negotiation process is to strike a balance between the insurer's risk management needs and the reinsurer's capacity and pricing requirements. This delicate balance is crucial to the success of the contract.

In order to reach an agreement, insurers and reinsurers must work together to identify common goals and interests. By doing so, they can create a mutually beneficial contract that meets both parties' needs.

Excess of loss reinsurance provides several benefits to insurers, including protection against large losses that could threaten their financial stability and solvency.

Stabilizing financial results is a key advantage, as it limits the impact of large losses on an insurer's balance sheet. This helps maintain their financial stability and solvency ratios.

By transferring a portion of their risk to reinsurers, insurers can improve their capital position and solvency ratios.

Excess of loss reinsurance also offers several advantages for insurance companies, including risk management, continuity of business operations, competitive pricing, and lower reinsurance costs.

Here are some specific ways Excess of Loss Reinsurance can benefit insurance companies:

However, Excess of Loss Reinsurance also presents some challenges, including high costs, uncertainty, and liquidity concerns.

Excess of loss reinsurance offers several key benefits to insurance companies. It protects them from significant losses that could threaten their financial stability and solvency.

One of the main advantages is that it limits the impact of large losses on an insurer's balance sheet, helping to stabilize their financial results. This is especially important for insurers who operate in high-risk industries or have a large number of policies.

By transferring a portion of their risk to reinsurers, insurers can improve their capital position and solvency ratios. This is a crucial aspect of maintaining financial stability and ensuring that they can continue to operate and pay claims.

Excess of loss reinsurance can also provide expertise and knowledge sharing between insurers and reinsurers. Reinsurers often have specialized expertise in specific lines of business or risk management techniques, which can be shared with insurers to improve their underwriting and risk management practices.

Here are some of the key benefits of excess of loss reinsurance:

Excess of loss reinsurance programs can be complex and challenging to manage. Basis risk is a possibility, where the reinsurance contract may not adequately cover the insurer's actual losses due to differences in the contract's structure and the insurer's risk profile.

Moral hazard is another challenge, where insurers with excess of loss reinsurance coverage may be more likely to take on higher risks or relax their underwriting standards, as they know that the reinsurer will cover their losses above the retention level.

Adverse selection is also a concern, where reinsurers may be more exposed to adverse selection if they only cover losses above a certain threshold, as insurers are more likely to seek reinsurance for their riskiest policies.

Regulatory and legal issues can add complexity and cost to excess of loss reinsurance arrangements, requiring insurers and reinsurers to comply with the regulatory and legal requirements in the jurisdictions in which they operate.

High costs are a significant challenge for insurers, especially if they have a high retention level or choose to cover multiple risks. Uncertainty is another challenge, as the unpredictable nature of catastrophic events and the potential for large losses can make it difficult for reinsurers to accurately price their coverage.

Liquidity concerns can also arise, as reinsurers may struggle to raise enough funds to pay all the claims in the event of a massive and simultaneous loss, causing liquidity issues for insurers.

Here are some of the key challenges and considerations in excess of loss reinsurance: