Flash Loan Attacks Stats: Understanding the Risks and Consequences

Flash loan attacks have been a growing concern in the DeFi space, with over $1.3 billion lost to such attacks in 2021 alone. This staggering number highlights the severity of the issue.

The average flash loan attack involves a loss of around $3.5 million, with some attacks resulting in losses of up to $80 million. These attacks are often carried out by sophisticated hackers who exploit vulnerabilities in smart contracts.

In 2021, the DeFi protocol Harvest Finance was hit by a flash loan attack, resulting in a loss of over $24 million. This attack was particularly notable due to its size and the fact that it was carried out using a combination of flash loans and other DeFi protocols.

Crypto loans are a type of loan that's available within the DeFi ecosystem.

They're uncollateralized, meaning you don't need to put up any assets as security to borrow large sums of cryptocurrency.

Flash loans are a specific type of crypto loan that allows users to borrow funds without collateral, and they must be repaid in full within the same transaction.

This is made possible by Ethereum's smart contract capabilities and the composability of DeFi protocols, which enables seamless stacking of various financial services.

Flash loans are attractive for DeFi traders looking to maximize arbitrage opportunities, and they're also commonly used for swapping collateral and self-liquidation.

A different take: Front Flash

A loan is a type of transaction that allows you to borrow funds without needing collateral.

Flash loans, a specific type of loan, are executed by smart contracts and enable participants to quickly borrow funds without the need for collateral.

These loans must be repaid in full within the same transaction, or else the entire transaction, including the loan itself, will be reversed.

Flash loans are attractive for DeFi traders looking to maximize arbitrage opportunities.

Flash loans are executed with precision, relying on smart contracts and predetermined logic and conditions.

The mechanism relies on the execution of a sequence of actions within a single transaction, with no room for errors.

First, the user initiates a flash loan by specifying the amount they want to borrow into a smart contract.

Conditions and logic are specified next, ensuring that the borrowed funds are returned to the lending platform along with any fees and interest, all within the same Ethereum block.

This ensures the entire flash loan transaction is completed within a single Ethereum block, which takes around 15 seconds.

If any part of the process fails, the smart contract automatically reverses the transaction, ensuring the borrowed funds never leave the lending platform.

A fee is included in the repayment, which varies and may include a percentage of the profits made during the flash loan.

Euler Finance, a permissionless borrowing and lending protocol on Ethereum, was hacked on March 13, 2023.

The hack resulted in a loss of roughly $197 million worth of cryptocurrency, spread across DAI, wBTC, stETH, and USDC.

The hack was made possible by a liquidity issue in the DonateToReserve function of the eToken, which allowed the hacker to create a false impression that the platform had a low amount of deposited eTokens.

A front-running MEV bot and the hacker's primary personal wallet were involved in the hack, with the hacker receiving initial funding from the sanctioned mixer Tornado Cash.

The hacker borrowed around $30 million in DAI from the DeFi protocol Aave, and then deposited $20 million of that DAI into Euler's platform, receiving a similar amount in eDAI tokens.

The hacker leveraged Euler's borrowing capabilities to borrow 10 times the original deposited amount, and then used the remaining $10 million in DAI to repay part of the acquired debt and reuse the mint function to borrow again.

Euler's native token, EUL, declined more than 45% following the hack.

Readers also liked: 10 Mortgage Loans

A price oracle attack is a type of flash loan attack that exploits a vulnerability in centralized price oracles. These oracles provide external price data to DeFi protocols, but can be manipulated by attackers.

Centralized price oracles are used by many DeFi protocols, including those that rely on single DEXs for price data. This makes them vulnerable to manipulation, as changes in the DEX's price data are considered true and accurate by the protocol's smart contracts.

Flash loans make it easy to manipulate price data on a single DEX, allowing attackers to create artificial arbitrage opportunities and exploit the vulnerability.

Here's a breakdown of how a price oracle attack works:

This type of attack was seen in the recent Cheese Bank incident, where a flash loan-funded price oracle attack was executed. The attack involved several steps, including borrowing, swapping, and depositing tokens.

A unique perspective: Blaidd Attack

A price oracle attack is a type of attack that exploits a vulnerability in certain price oracles, which are third-party services that allow smart contracts to receive external price data from outside of their ecosystem.

These attacks are made possible by the use of flash loans, which are essentially instant loans that can be used to manipulate prices on a single exchange.

Centralized price oracles are a key component of these attacks, as they allow an attacker to manipulate the price of an asset on a single DEX, leading to inaccurate price data being fed to all protocols that rely on that DEX.

Any changes in price data on a single DEX are considered true and accurate by the protocol's smart contracts, making it vulnerable to exploitation.

Here are the key steps involved in a price oracle attack:

The recent attack on Cheese Bank is a good example of how a flash loan-funded price oracle attack works, with the attacker using a flash loan to manipulate the price of an asset on a single DEX.

Chainlink oracles, on the other hand, use decentralized networks of nodes to aggregate price data from multiple independent data aggregation firms, making them more resistant to flash loan attacks.

By using Chainlink Price Feeds, smart contract developers can ensure that their protocols receive an aggregated price point that is reflective of market-wide trading activity and untouchable by flash loans.

Code vulnerabilities in smart contracts can lead to flash loan attacks.

The Euler Finance exploit, which resulted in a $197 million loss, was a prime example of this.

Code vulnerabilities can be exploited by attackers to manipulate flash loans.

This highlights the importance of thoroughly testing and reviewing smart contracts for potential vulnerabilities.

A price oracle attack can have devastating consequences, as seen in the bZx attack in April 2020, resulting in almost $1 million in losses.

The goal of a price manipulation attack is to influence the price of a particular asset, which can trigger liquidations or exploit vulnerabilities in the pricing oracle of a DeFi platform.

This type of attack can be particularly damaging because it can create artificial price differences that are difficult to detect.

The bZx attack is a prime example of how a price manipulation attack can go wrong, leaving a trail of financial devastation in its wake.

The Euler hack situation highlights the importance of identifying DeFi platform vulnerabilities to prevent catastrophic events.

Circuit breakers could be used to temporarily halt protocols when there are unusually large price movements or outflows, allowing hacks to be stopped early.

The hack on Euler Finance was made possible by a liquidity issue in the DonateToReserve function of the eToken, which was not burning dTokens, leading to incorrect conversions of borrowed assets to collateralized assets.

Using circuit breakers could have potentially stopped the hack early, as it involved unusually large outflows of funds.

The hacker received initial funding from the sanctioned mixer Tornado Cash for gas fees and to create the contracts used in the exploit, then initiated a flash loan to borrow around $30 million in DAI from the DeFi protocol Aave.

Implementing measures to prevent sanctioned mixers from being used for malicious activities could also help reduce hacking risks.

The hacker was able to borrow 10 times the original deposited amount by leveraging Euler's borrowing capabilities, and then used the remaining funds to repay part of the acquired debt and reuse the mint function to borrow again.

We can learn from the Euler hack situation and implement measures to prevent similar attacks in the future.

Flash loans are a type of uncollateralized, short-term loan available within the DeFi ecosystem, allowing users to borrow large sums of cryptocurrency without putting up any assets as security.

These loans can be obtained on platforms like Equalizer, Aave, Uniswap, DyDx, and MakerDAO.

The borrowed amount will automatically be paid back to the platform, and if something goes wrong, the entire transaction will automatically reverse, returning the borrowed funds to the lending platform and undoing any actions or trades initiated with the loan.

You may also incur fees or penalties, depending on the policies of the DeFi platform.

The use of flash loans in attacks on DeFi protocols is a growing concern, as they can increase the number of people who can conduct an attack and reduce the capital at risk for the attacker.

Here are some reasons why flash loans make attacks more viable:

If you don't pay a flash loan, the borrowed amount will automatically be paid back to the platform.

The entire transaction will automatically reverse, undoing any actions or trades you initiated with the loan. This means any potential gains or losses will be nullified.

You may also incur fees or penalties, depending on the policies of the DeFi platform. These fees can add up quickly, so it's essential to understand the terms before taking out a loan.

DeFi platforms are not immune to hacking risks, and one way to mitigate this is by using circuit breakers to halt protocols during unusually large price movements or outflows.

Circuit breakers can help stop hacks early, preventing catastrophic events like the Euler hack.

Identifying vulnerabilities in DeFi platforms can be challenging, but there are methods to reduce hacking risks.

Flash loan attacks can be particularly devastating, but using circuit breakers can help prevent them.

We will continue to monitor the Euler hack situation and provide updates as possible.

Loan funding is available through various platforms. You can get flash loans on platforms like Equalizer, Aave, Uniswap, DyDx, and MakerDAO.

Flash loans can be a convenient option for crypto investors. They allow you to borrow and repay cryptocurrency in a single transaction.

To access these loans, you'll need to meet certain requirements. Each platform has its own set of rules and regulations to ensure that borrowers can repay their loans.

Equalizer and Aave are two popular platforms for crypto flash loans. They offer competitive interest rates and flexible repayment terms.

MakerDAO is another option for borrowing cryptocurrency. It's a decentralized lending platform that allows users to borrow DAI, a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar.

DyDx and Uniswap are also platforms that offer flash loans. They're known for their user-friendly interfaces and fast transaction times.

Before taking out a flash loan, make sure you understand the terms and conditions. This will help you avoid any unexpected fees or penalties.

On a similar theme: Crypto Mortgage Loans

Flash loans are often used non-maliciously to take advantage of arbitrage opportunities across different exchanges. However, they've been increasingly used in attacks on DeFi protocols.

Flash loans don't create new vulnerabilities, but they do make attacks more viable for several reasons. They allow anyone with the technical ability to conduct an attack, regardless of their financial standing.

Here are the key factors that make flash loans attractive to attackers:

In most cases, flash loans are just a tool, and the real culprit is vulnerabilities in smart contracts. If smart contracts were built more robustly, flash loan attacks would not be possible.