
Wachovia Bank National Association was a major player in the US banking industry, but its fortunes took a drastic turn during the financial crisis of 2008. The bank's assets exceeded $2.2 trillion, making it one of the largest banks in the country.
The bank's problems began to surface in 2008, as the housing market began to collapse and the value of its assets plummeted. Wachovia's exposure to the subprime mortgage market was significant, with over $122 billion in such assets on its books.
Wachovia's management tried to navigate the crisis, but its efforts were ultimately unsuccessful. The bank's stock price plummeted, and it became clear that a rescue was needed.
Broaden your view: Wachovia
Wachovia Bank History
Wachovia Bank was founded in 1879 by Latham Thomas, who opened a small bank called Wachovia National Bank in Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
The bank's early success was largely due to its conservative approach to banking, which allowed it to weather the economic downturns of the late 19th century.
Wachovia Bank expanded rapidly in the early 20th century, opening branches throughout North Carolina and eventually across the United States.
By the 1950s, Wachovia Bank had grown to become one of the largest banks in the country.
The bank continued to expand through the 1990s and 2000s, making several major acquisitions along the way.
In 2008, Wachovia Bank merged with Wells Fargo, bringing an end to its existence as a standalone bank.
Notable Cases and Lawsuits
Wachovia Bank National Association was involved in a notable case related to Latin drug cartel money laundering. In April 2008, federal prosecutors initiated a probe into Wachovia and other U.S. banks for aiding drug money laundering.
Wachovia admitted to having insufficient anti-money laundering controls on $378.4 billion of transfers between 2004 and 2007. The violations were described as "serious and systemic" and as the "largest violation of the Bank Secrecy Act".
Wachovia negotiated a deferred prosecution agreement with the Justice Department to resolve criminal charges for willfully failing to set up an effective anti-money-laundering program. It agreed to forfeit $110 million and pay a $50 million fine to the U.S. Treasury.
Expand your knowledge: Insurance Cover on Business - Merchant Services
Merger of First Union

The Merger of First Union was a significant event in the banking industry. It was completed in 2008, resulting in the creation of Wells Fargo & Company.
The merger was a result of First Union's acquisition of Wachovia Corporation, another large bank. This acquisition was a major deal, with a total value of over $15 billion.
First Union had been expanding rapidly in the early 2000s, and the acquisition of Wachovia was a strategic move to increase its market share. The merged bank, Wells Fargo & Company, became one of the largest banks in the United States.
The merger was completed on January 1, 2008, and Wells Fargo began operating as a single bank. The acquisition was a major milestone in the history of the banking industry.
See what others are reading: Health Insurance Major Medical Coverage
Failed Mbna Purchase
In June 2005, Wachovia's attempt to purchase monoline credit card company MBNA fell through due to disagreements over the purchase price.
Wachovia received $100 million from MBNA as part of an agreement made in 2000 by Wachovia's predecessor, First Union.

This payment was a result of the sale of First Union's credit card portfolio to MBNA, which included a clause requiring MBNA to pay this sum if it was ever sold to a competitor.
Wachovia ended its relationship with MBNA and created its own credit card division, allowing the bank to issue its own Visa cards.
The deal was not well-received by investors, who were skeptical of Wachovia's purchase of Golden West at the peak of the US housing boom.
Broaden your view: People's Own Savings Bank
Westcorp
Westcorp was the parent company of Western Financial Bank, and it was involved in a significant acquisition in 2005. Wachovia announced a proposed acquisition of Westcorp and WFS Financial Inc. in September 2005.
The acquisition was approved by Westcorp and WFS Financial Inc. shareholders on January 6, 2006. This marked a significant move for Wachovia, which became the ninth largest auto finance lender in the U.S. market.
The merger was completed on March 1, 2006. This acquisition provided Wachovia with a small retail and commercial banking presence in Southern California.
The former 19 Western Financial Bank branches opened under the Wachovia name on February 12, 2007.
Watters v. 550 U.S. 1 (2007)

Watters v. 550 U.S. 1 (2007) was a significant case that clarified the scope of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) and its impact on banking regulations.
The case involved a bank employee who was arrested and charged with money laundering, but the charges were eventually dropped due to a technicality.
The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the GLBA did not preempt state banking regulations, allowing states to maintain their authority over banking activities.
This decision had far-reaching implications for the banking industry, as it clarified the boundaries of federal and state authority in regulating banking activities.
The Court's ruling also highlighted the importance of understanding the nuances of federal and state laws when engaging in banking activities.
Consider reading: Court Square Capital Partners
Identity Theft Negligence
Wachovia's negligence in screening and taking action against companies linked with identity theft was a major issue. In 2007, a New York Times article revealed that Wachovia accepted $142 million in unsigned checks from companies that made unauthorized withdrawals from thousands of accounts.

These companies used stolen identities to remove funds from personal Wachovia bank accounts. Wachovia collected millions of dollars in fees from them.
Despite receiving thousands of warnings that it was processing fraudulent checks, Wachovia ignored them. This lack of action led to a significant penalty.
In 2008, Wachovia agreed to pay up to $144 million to end the investigation without admitting wrongdoing. This penalty is one of the largest ever demanded by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Latin Drug Cartel Laundering
In April 2008, the Wall Street Journal reported that federal prosecutors had initiated a probe into Wachovia and other U.S. banks for aiding drug money laundering by Mexican and Colombian money-transfer companies.
Wachovia viewed this as a way to gain a foothold in the Hispanic banking market and saw it as a lucrative industry that could charge high fees.
The probe was launched due to the significant money-laundering risk presented by these companies, which help Mexican immigrants send remittances back to family in Mexico.
Between 2004 and 2007, Wachovia had insufficient anti-money laundering controls on $378.4 billion of transfers.
This oversight allowed Mexican and Colombian drug cartels to launder at least $110 million.
Wachovia negotiated a deferred prosecution agreement with the Justice Department to resolve criminal charges for willfully failing to set up an effective anti-money-laundering program.
It agreed to forfeit $110 million and pay a $50 million fine to the U.S. Treasury.
Reports revealed that Wachovia ignored warnings and suspicious activity reports (SARs) from its London-based director of anti-money-laundering.
Defeasance and Financial Transactions
Wachovia Defeasance Wachovia 2003-C6 Iii Llc became a new subsidiary organization for Wachovia Bank, National Association.
A complete timeline for Wachovia Bank, National Association is available, but it's worth noting that this specific subsidiary was formed to handle defeasance transactions.
Defeasance is a complex financial concept, but in simple terms, it's a way to remove an obligation, such as a loan, from a mortgage or other financial instrument.
Defeasance 2003-C6 III

Defeasance 2003-C6 III is a notable example in the world of financial transactions. Wachovia Defeasance Wachovia 2003-C6 Iii Llc became a new subsidiary organization for Wachovia Bank, National Association.
This subsidiary was formed in connection with a specific financial transaction. The complete timeline for Wachovia Bank, National Association is available for those interested in learning more.
Defeasance 2003-C6 III highlights the complexities of financial transactions. It shows how a single event can lead to the creation of a new subsidiary organization.
Wachovia Defeasance Wachovia 2003-C6 Iii Llc is a specific example of this process.
Intriguing read: Credit One Bank Lvnv Funding
Defeasance Geccmc 2002-3 LLC
Defeasance Geccmc 2002-3 LLC is a type of subsidiary organization. It was formed by Wachovia Bank, National Association.
This subsidiary organization was created to manage specific financial transactions. Wachovia Bank, National Association used it to become involved in the financial market.
A notable example of Defeasance Geccmc 2002-3 LLC in action is Wachovia Defeasance Geccmc 2002-3 Iii Llc, which became a new subsidiary organization for Wachovia Bank, National Association.
This type of subsidiary organization is typically used for managing complex financial transactions.
Defeasance LLC 2005-C5 III

Defeasance LLC 2005-C5 III is a subsidiary organization that was formed by Wachovia Bank, National Association.
Wachovia Defeasance Lb-Ubs 2005-C5 Iii Llc became a new subsidiary organization for Wachovia Bank, National Association.
This LLC was likely created to handle specific financial transactions and responsibilities.
Defeasance LLC 2005-C5 III is an example of how banks and financial institutions can establish new subsidiaries to manage their operations and assets.
Investment and Performance
Wachovia Bank National Association offered a range of investment products, including brokerage services and investment management.
Wachovia Securities, a subsidiary of the bank, provided brokerage services to individual and institutional clients, with a focus on research and analysis to help investors make informed decisions.
In terms of performance, Wachovia reported a net income of $3.9 billion in 2007, with a return on equity of 11.6%.
Business Lines
Wachovia was organized into four main divisions: General Bank, Wealth Management, Capital Management, and Corporate and Investment Bank. These divisions catered to different types of customers and provided a range of services.
The General Bank division served retail, small business, and commercial customers. This division was a key part of Wachovia's business, providing everyday banking services to individuals and businesses.
Wachovia's Wealth Management division focused on high-net-worth clients, offering personal trust, insurance, and other services. This division was designed to meet the complex needs of wealthy individuals and families.
Capital Management, on the other hand, provided asset management, retirement, and retail brokerage services. This division helped clients manage their investments and plan for the future.
The Corporate and Investment Bank division offered capital markets, investment banking, and financial advisory services to corporate clients. This division was a key player in Wachovia's business, helping companies raise capital and navigate complex financial transactions.
Here are some of the key businesses that operated under Wachovia's Corporate and Investment Bank division:
- Wachovia Securities: provided retail brokerage services nationwide and in six Latin American countries
- Wachovia Capital Partners: Wachovia's private equity arm
- Wachovia Capital Finance: the asset-based lending group
MSCI 2004-Top 13 LLC
Wachovia Bank, National Association had a subsidiary organization called Wachovia Defeasance Msci 2004-Top13 Iii Llc.
This subsidiary became a new organization for Wachovia Bank, National Association in some capacity.
Financial Crisis and Government Intervention
Wachovia Bank National Association faced significant challenges during the 2007-2009 financial crisis due to its exposure to risky loans.
In the first quarter of 2007, Wachovia reported $2.3 billion in earnings, but by the second quarter of 2008, the bank had experienced a massive $8.9 billion loss.
Wachovia's CEO Ken Thompson was forced to retire on June 2, 2008, after serving as head of the company since 2000.
The board replaced Thompson with Chairman Lanty Smith, who had already taken over as chairman a month earlier, on an interim basis.
Wachovia's struggles led the company to hire Treasury Undersecretary Bob Steel as its new CEO on July 9, 2008, in an effort to navigate its difficulties.
2007–2009 Financial Crisis
The 2007-2009 financial crisis was a tumultuous time for Wachovia, a bank that had made some reckless decisions. It exposed itself to risky loans, including adjustable rate mortgages acquired during the acquisition of Golden West Financial in 2006.
Wachovia began to experience heavy losses in its loan portfolios during the subprime mortgage crisis. The bank's financial woes started to show in its quarterly earnings, with a $2.3 billion profit in the first quarter of 2007.
However, in the second quarter of 2008, Wachovia reported a much larger than anticipated $8.9 billion loss. This massive loss was a clear indication that the bank was in trouble.
Wachovia's CEO at the time, Ken Thompson, was forced to retire on June 2, 2008. He had been head of the company since 2000, while it was still known as First Union.
The board replaced Thompson with Chairman Lanty Smith on an interim basis. Smith had already taken over as chairman a month earlier, on May 2, 2008.
In a last-ditch effort to turn things around, Wachovia hired Treasury Undersecretary Bob Steel as its new CEO on July 9, 2008. Steel's experience was seen as a potential solution to the company's difficulties.
Government Intervention
The government's role in financial crises is a crucial one. In the 2008 crisis, the US government passed the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) to provide $426 billion in bailout funds to struggling banks.
This intervention was a response to the freezing of the credit market, which had a ripple effect on the entire economy. The government's actions helped to stabilize the financial system and prevent a complete collapse.
The Federal Reserve, led by Chairman Ben Bernanke, also played a key role in providing liquidity to the markets through quantitative easing. This involved buying up mortgage-backed securities to inject capital into the system.
The government's actions were not without controversy, however. Many critics argued that the bailout favored large financial institutions over smaller ones, exacerbating inequality.
Despite these criticisms, the government's intervention is widely credited with helping to mitigate the crisis and prevent a global economic downturn.
Recommended read: Postal Savings System
Historical Data and Leadership
Wachovia Bank National Association was a significant player in the banking industry, especially in the late 2000s. It was the fourth largest bank in the United States at the end of 2008, excluding its subsidiaries.
G. Kennedy Thompson served as the CEO of Wachovia from 2001 to 2008, a period marked by the bank's rapid growth. Robert K. Steel took over as CEO in 2008, but his tenure was short-lived.
Here's a brief overview of Wachovia's leadership during its peak years:
Note that this leadership team played a crucial role in shaping the bank's direction during a tumultuous period in the financial industry.
Historical Data (2000–2008)
Wachovia was the fourth largest bank at the end of 2008, excluding its subsidiaries. This ranking gives us a glimpse into the bank's size and influence during this period.
The year 2008 marked a significant point in Wachovia's history, as it was the end of the historical data period being referenced here.
Chief Executive Officers
The chief executive officers of a bank play a crucial role in shaping its direction and leadership. G. Kennedy Thompson served as the CEO from 2001 to 2008.
Here are the CEOs of the bank mentioned in the article:
- G. Kennedy Thompson (2001-2008)
- Robert K. Steel (2008)
These individuals have been instrumental in guiding the bank through various periods, including times of great change and upheaval.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Wachovia Bank still in business?
Wachovia Bank ceased to exist as a separate entity after merging with Wells Fargo Bank in 2010. The Wachovia brand was phased out, but some legacy services and products may still be available.
Is Wachovia Bank the same as Wells Fargo?
Yes, Wachovia Bank is now part of Wells Fargo, a result of a merger that took place. Wells Fargo acquired Wachovia in 2008, expanding its presence in the US financial services market.
Sources
Featured Images: pexels.com