Vulture Funds and Global Economic Systems

Vulture funds have a significant impact on global economic systems, often buying up distressed debt at a low price and then seeking to recover the full amount from the debtor country. This can lead to financial burdens for the country.

Many vulture funds are based in tax havens, such as the Cayman Islands and Bermuda, where they can take advantage of lax regulations and low tax rates.

Vulture funds often target countries with weak economies or those that have recently experienced a financial crisis, making it difficult for them to negotiate a favorable deal.

See what others are reading: Vulture Capitalism Book

Vulture funds are a type of hedge fund that purchases debt at a low price on the secondary market, making a large profit in the process. They're often seen as scavengers, preying on debtors in financial distress.

The term "vulture fund" is a metaphor that compares these funds to vultures, highlighting their behavior of profiting from others' misfortune. This comparison is frequently considered derogatory.

Financiers working with vulture funds argue that their lawsuits force accountability for national borrowing and uncover public corruption.

Here's an interesting read: Vulture Capitalism

Vulture funds specialize in buying distressed investments, such as high-yield bonds in or near default, or equities that are in or near bankruptcy.

These funds focus on "swooping in" and picking up underpriced shares that are perceived to have been oversold to make high-risk but potentially high-reward bets.

They typically target high-yield bonds and equities, aiming to profit from the undervaluation of these securities.

Take a look at this: Magellan Global Equities Fund

Vulture capitalists are a type of venture capitalist who specifically look for opportunities to make money by buying poor or distressed firms. They are known for taking control over someone else's innovations and the money that person would have acquired from those innovations.

These investors are often criticized for their aggressive behavior, as they are seen as preying on the companies they buy in order to make a profit. They will seek out the most distressed companies at really low prices and go to great lengths to keep their costs down so as to make the most profit.

Take a look at this: Funding a Startup

Vulture capitalists may look to cut down staff, which can lead to unemployment and cause a ripple effect in the economy. This is a concern, as it can have far-reaching consequences for individuals and communities.

Here's a breakdown of the characteristics of vulture capitalists:

Vulture capitalists are often at the center of controversy, as their methods can be seen as predatory and exploitative.

Vulture funds are a type of investment fund that seeks out and buys securities in distressed investments, such as high-yield bonds in or near default, or equities that are in or near bankruptcy.

These funds typically focus on fixed income instruments like high-yield bonds and loans that pay fixed or variable interest rates. They often invest in government debt of distressed countries, which requires even greater lobbyist involvement in resolving unpaid debts.

Vulture funds aim to "swoop in" and pick up underpriced shares that are perceived to have been oversold, making high-risk but potentially high-reward bets.

Recommended read: Fixed Liability

To achieve this strategy, portfolio managers seek deeply discounted investments with high potential rates of return due to the high default risks.

Some key strategies employed by vulture funds include researching companies on the edge of bankruptcy, analyzing whether investments in these companies will yield profits, and obtaining information about the loans and fixed income securities of these companies.

Here are some specific steps vulture funds take:

Legislation aimed at preventing vulture funds from profiting on defaulted sovereign debt was introduced in the US Congress in 2009, but did not pass.

The Stop VULTURE Funds Act was introduced in the US, but it was not passed. However, similar legislation was passed in the United Kingdom, Belgium, Jersey, the Isle of Man, and Australia.

Sovereign debt collection was rare until the 1950s when sovereign immunity of government issuers started to become restricted by contract terms.

The freezing of Brazil's gold reserves held by the Federal Reserve in the 1950s was one example of sovereign debt collection actions beginning.

If this caught your attention, see: How to Get Debt off Credit Report

Investment in sovereign debt with the intent to recover was restricted due to the laws of champerty and maintenance.

Most jurisdictions have now eliminated the doctrine of champerty as archaic, making it easier to invest in sovereign debt with the intent to recover.

The syndication of debt among banks in the late 1980s made recovery impractical, as a fund intending to litigate had to buy out the entire syndicate of holders.

The creation of new and easily traded instruments such as Brady bonds in the 1980s brought new players into the market, including banks and hedge funds.

The original creditors then wrote down their positions and sold the debt into the secondary market, which is a market consisting of banks and investment funds focused on buying at discounts to achieve above market returns on their investment.

The result is that the old syndicates were broken up and many unreconstructed syndicate "tails" were available for purchase at discounts exceeding 80% of the principal face value.

Broaden your view: Private Equity in the 1980s

Legislation has played a crucial role in regulating vulture funds. In 2009, bipartisan legislation was introduced in the US Congress to prevent vulture funds from profiting on defaulted sovereign debt.

The Stop VULTURE Funds Act aimed to cap the amount of profit a secondary creditor can win through litigation based on those debts. However, the legislation did not pass in the United States.

Similar legislation was passed in the United Kingdom, Belgium, Jersey, the Isle of Man, and Australia. The States of Guernsey even debated legislation in 2012.

Recommended read: Payday Loan United States

The Organisation of American States (OAS) denounced the vulture funds for blocking payments to other creditors in Argentina, with the exception of the United States and Canada.

The G77+China criticized the vulture funds, stating that their actions pose a danger to the future process of debt swaps and are detrimental to both developing and developed nations.

The US-based Council on Foreign Relations questioned the US Supreme Court's rejection of Argentina's appeal in its legal dispute with the vulture funds, claiming that such actions make it more difficult for countries to free themselves from debt.

The Council on Foreign Relations described Thomas Griesa's ruling against Argentina in favour of vulture funds as "punishing the innocent" and "turning the natural order of debt on its head".

Readers also liked: Wec Investor Relations

In the UK, the government has taken steps to regulate vulture funds. The Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Act passed in 2010 removed the ability of vulture funds to use UK courts to enforce contested debts.

Gordon Brown, the British Chancellor at the time, was a vocal critic of vulture funds, calling their practices "morally outrageous" in a 2002 speech to the United Nations.

Consider reading: Uk Index Funds

The United Nations plays a crucial role in shaping global policies and regulations.

In 2014, the UN General Assembly voted to support a new bankruptcy process for sovereign nations. This process aims to promote debt restructuring by excluding so-called "vulture funds" from the process.

The vote was overwhelmingly in favor, with 124 countries voting yes and only 11 countries voting against the measure.

In 2016, the Irish State closed tax loopholes used by US distressed debt funds, also known as "vulture funds", to avoid paying taxes on over €80 billion of Irish distressed assets.

Explore further: Distressed Securities Fund

The funds, advised by IFSC tax-law firms, had exploited the loopholes to avoid paying capital gain, withholding tax, and VAT/duty. This caused a national scandal in Ireland.

The Irish State did not prosecute the "vulture funds" for tax avoidance, and instead created a new structure called the L-QIAIF, which does not file public accounts, for them to transfer over €55 billion of assets.

This structure was created in 2018, and by 2018, the "vulture funds" had transferred over one-quarter of Ireland's GNI* (Gross National Income*) into it.

In a surprising move, the Irish Taoiseach, Leo Varadkar, praised the activity of "vulture funds" in Ireland in 2018, despite the public backlash against their activities.

A fresh viewpoint: Private Equity Returns vs Public Markets

In Argentina, the government defaulted on its debts in 2001 due to an economic crisis. This led to vulture funds purchasing some of the debts, which were then settled in 2016.

The Demographic Republic of Congo was also in a debt crisis, with creditors pressuring the country to repay its debt. A vulture fund, FG Hemisphere Vulture Fund Management, purchased the debt for $3 million and recovered $100 million, including interest and legal fees.

Here are some notable cases involving vulture funds:

Argentina's debt crisis in 2001 led to the country defaulting on its government debts. The vulture fund purchased some of these debts and eventually settled with Argentina in 2016 for $6.5 billion.

The Demographic Republic of Congo was also in a debt crisis, with creditors pressuring the country to repay. A vulture fund called FG Hemisphere Vulture Fund Management, an American company, purchased the debt for $3 million and recovered $100 million, including interest and legal fees.

Vulture funds have been successful in recovering debts for banks and investors. In the case of Argentina, the vulture fund purchased the debt at a discount and then negotiated a settlement with the country. This is a common strategy for vulture funds.

Here are some notable legacy cases involving vulture funds:

Puerto Rico's debt crisis is a significant example of a country facing financial difficulties. It owes more than $75 billion in pension and bond debt to its creditors, primarily US hedge fund and mutual fund managers.

Aurelius Capital Management, Franklin, and Oppenheimer are some of the leading creditors. The Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (PROMESA) was enacted in 2016 to restructure the territory's debts and adjust its budget.

The debt restructuring process is ongoing, with the oversight board announcing a deal with bondholders for around $35 billion, accounting for nearly 50% of the total bonded debt. This deal provides for a significant "haircut", with an average of 60% deducted from the market value of the bonds.

In simpler terms, a haircut refers to the percentage of an asset's value that is deducted from its market value. In this case, the creditors will receive less than the original value of the bonds.

Here's a breakdown of the deal:

This deal is a result of the vulture funds' role in the debt restructuring process. Vulture funds, as seen in the example of Company ABC, buy distressed companies' bonds or securities at significant discounts and then negotiate with the companies for payment. In the case of Puerto Rico, vulture funds have played a prominent role in the debt restructuring process.

Suggestion: Private Equity Fees Charged to Portfolio Companies