The History of Wells Fargo Scandals and Their Impact

Wells Fargo has a long history of scandals that have had a significant impact on the company and its customers. The bank's troubles began in the 1850s with the California Gold Rush, where Wells Fargo employees were accused of embezzlement and theft.

The bank's reputation continued to suffer in the early 20th century due to its involvement in the Ponzi scheme of Charles Ponzi, who was a bank employee at the time. Ponzi's scheme was one of the first large-scale investment scams in U.S. history.

In the 1990s, Wells Fargo faced criticism for its role in the savings and loan crisis, where the bank was accused of helping to inflate the value of troubled assets. This led to a series of lawsuits and settlements that cost the bank millions of dollars.

The bank's troubles continued into the 21st century with a series of scandals involving mortgage lending, including the infamous "Operation Prime Time" scandal, where Wells Fargo employees were accused of creating fake accounts and charging customers for services they never received. This scandal led to a $3 billion settlement with regulators and a significant hit to the bank's reputation.

Additional reading: Wells Fargo Fire Employees for Pretending to Work

The Wells Fargo fake accounts scandal was uncovered in 2016, resulting in a $185 million fine and the departure of CEO John Stumpf.

The scandal involved employees opening up to 2 million unauthorized accounts in customers' names without their knowledge or consent.

Wells Fargo customers were also charged exorbitant fees for services they never used, such as overdraft protection and credit monitoring.

The bank's employees were under intense pressure to meet sales targets, leading to the creation of fake accounts.

Wells Fargo has a history of prioritizing profits over people, dating back to the 2008 housing market crash.

The bank was accused of foreclosing on homes without properly reviewing the paperwork, leaving many families homeless.

In 2018, Wells Fargo agreed to pay $1 billion to settle a lawsuit over its mortgage practices.

The bank's CEO at the time, Timothy Sloan, was criticized for his handling of the scandal and his lack of transparency.

Wells Fargo's reputation has been marred by scandal after scandal, eroding trust in the bank and its leadership.

Expand your knowledge: Wells Fargo Employees Fired

The Wells Fargo scandals have had far-reaching consequences, affecting millions of customers and investors. The bank's fake accounts scandal alone resulted in over 5,300 employees being fired and $185 million in fines paid.

The scandal also led to a significant decline in customer trust, with many customers feeling betrayed by the bank's actions. In fact, a survey found that 75% of customers lost trust in Wells Fargo after the scandal broke.

The consequences of the scandals have also been felt in the stock market, with Wells Fargo's stock price plummeting in 2016. The bank's reputation has taken a hit, making it harder for the company to attract new customers and investors.

The initial impact of the fines was significant, with Wells Fargo placing ads in newspapers taking responsibility for the controversy.

Wells Fargo's initial response was to reject the notion that its sales culture led to the actions of employees, saying the fraud was not part of an intentional strategy.

Stumpf, the bank's CEO, expressed that he would be willing to accept some personal blame for the problems.

The company executives and spokespeople referred to the problem as an issue with sales practices, rather than the company's broader culture.

Wells Fargo's legacy is one of scandal and controversy, with a 2017 annual meeting where 9 out of 15 directors received less than 75 percent support.

The bank's efforts to reexamine its business led to the resignations of 6 directors, including board chairman Stephen Sanger, who was replaced by Elizabeth Duke.

In August 2017, Wells Fargo increased its estimate of potentially unauthorized consumer accounts to 3.5 million and issued an additional $2.8 million in refunds.

The Federal Reserve Board took unprecedented action in February 2018, placing a strict limit on the company's asset size due to "widespread consumer abuses."

Wells Fargo agreed to pay $1 billion to settle auto and mortgage lending violations with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in April 2018.

The company also agreed to pay $575 million to settle civil claims with 50 state attorneys general in December 2018.

The bank's struggles to reform and regain trust are a testament to the severity of its mistakes and the importance of holding companies accountable for their actions.

A fresh viewpoint: Does Amazon Pay Well

Wells Fargo's financial implications were significant due to the regulatory scrutiny it faced in response to the scandal. This scrutiny weighed heavily on the bank's performance, making recovery difficult.

A growth cap imposed by the Federal Reserve, combined with low interest rates, made it challenging for the bank to recover. To reduce costs, executives under CEO Charlie Scharf reevaluated the bank's lines of business, aiming to trim or dispose of those outside its core offerings.

The sale of the bank's student loan business to private equity firms Apollo and Blackstone in December 2020 was a major implication of this refocus. Potential bidders for the asset management business, which was also up for sale, included Minneapolis-based Ameriprise and Canadian investment management firm CI Financial.

The bank's reliance on external consultants, which initially included firms like McKinsey and Promontory Financial Group, was significant, with spending on these firms reaching as high as $758 million a quarter. This high level of reliance was described as "off the charts" and "comical" by an employee.

You might enjoy: Wells Fargo Business Account Fee

To address its issues with compliance, the bank cut back on spending on consultants and implemented other cost-saving measures, including layoffs. These cuts were announced alongside other measures aimed at reducing costs.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency made comments in 2023 about breaking up large banks that couldn't come into compliance with regulations, which was interpreted as being directed at banks like Wells Fargo.

Wells Fargo faced initial fines and broader coverage of the scandal in September 2016, with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announcing a $185 million fine for the bank's illegal activity.

The fine was split among several parties, with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau receiving $100 million, the Los Angeles City Attorney receiving $50 million, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency receiving $35 million.

The fines received substantial media coverage, triggering attention from further interested parties and bringing national attention to the controversy.

Worth a look: Wells Fargo Financial Literacy Month

The government took a long time to crack down on Wells Fargo's sales culture and cross-selling strategy, but when they did, it was big time. In September 2016, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced a $185 million fine for the bank's illegal activity.

Prosecutors from New York City, San Francisco, and North Carolina opened their own investigations into the fraud, and the Securities and Exchange Commission opened its own investigation in November 2016.

The Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission reached a settlement with the bank in February 2020 for a total fine of $3 billion to address the bank's criminal and civil violations.

The fine was a result of the bank's reckless lack of institutional control and its culture that actively promotes wanton greed, as stated by California Treasurer John Chiang.

Expand your knowledge: Wells Fargo Securities Class Action

In September 2016, California suspended its relationship with Wells Fargo, removing the bank as bookrunner on two municipal bond issuings and suspending investments in the bank.

The state's decision was made by John Chiang, the California State Treasurer, who cited the company's disregard for the well-being of Californians as the reason for the decision.

The city of Chicago also divested $25 million invested with Wells Fargo in the same month, a significant move that highlighted the bank's loss of trust among major clients.

Chicago alderman Edward M. Burke introduced a measure barring the city from doing business with Wells Fargo for two years, further isolating the bank from major clients.

Other cities and municipalities, including Philadelphia and Seattle, also ended their relationships with Wells Fargo, with Seattle citing the company's support of the Dakota Access Pipeline as a reason for the decision.

Tim Sloan, the former COO who later became CEO, resigned in March 2019 under pressure related to the scandal. He was replaced by Charles Scharf, the former CEO of both Visa and BNY Mellon.

Scharf was appointed with the expectation that he would rehabilitate the bank's reputation with regulators, having previously overseen turnaround efforts at BNY Mellon. As of October 2020, he had not introduced a comprehensive plan to address the problems faced by the bank.

John Stumpf, the previous CEO, expressed willingness to accept personal blame for the problems, but company executives and spokespeople referred to the issue as a sales practices problem rather than a broader cultural issue.

The public's perception of Wells Fargo took a hit in 2016, when the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced a $185 million fine for the bank's illegal activity. This marked a turning point in the scandal's national attention.

Many were surprised by Wells Fargo's initial unwillingness to take responsibility, with CEO John Stumpf refusing to resign at first. Politicians from both sides, including Elizabeth Warren and Jeb Hensarling, called for further investigation beyond what the CFPB had done.

The media coverage of the scandal was extensive, with the Wall Street Journal having documented Wells Fargo's sales culture and cross-selling strategy as early as 2011. The Los Angeles Times investigation in 2013 revealed intense pressure on bank managers and employees to produce sales against unrealistic quotas.

You might enjoy: What Is the Lending Club Scandal

The early coverage of Wells Fargo's issues with its sales culture and cross-selling strategy is a fascinating story. The Wall Street Journal documented the bank's problems as early as 2011.

A Los Angeles Times investigation in 2013 revealed intense pressure on bank managers and individual bankers to produce sales against extremely aggressive and even mathematically impossible quotas. This led to employees opening accounts without customer consent.

COO Timothy Sloan was quoted in the Los Angeles Times article stating he was unaware of any "overbearing sales culture." He would later replace John Stumpf as CEO.

Wells Fargo employees reportedly opened as many as 1.5 million checking and savings accounts, and more than 500,000 credit cards, without customers' authorization. This is a staggering number that highlights the extent of the problem.

The employees received bonuses for opening new credit cards and checking accounts and enrolling customers in products such as online banking. This incentive plan was a key factor in the bank's sales culture gone wrong.

California Treasurer John Chiang stated: "Wells Fargo's fleecing of its customers... demonstrates, at best, a reckless lack of institutional control and, at worst, a culture which actively promotes wanton greed." His words sum up the severity of the issue.

The New York Department of Financial Services (NY DFS) issued the Interagency Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies in 2010. This guidance monitors incentive-based compensation structures and requires banks to balance risk and rewards.

If this caught your attention, see: Wells Fargo Fires Employees over Mouse Jigglers

Politicians on both sides of the aisle called for investigation beyond what was done by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. This included Elizabeth Warren and Jeb Hensarling.

Many people were surprised by Wells Fargo's CEO, John Stumpf, initial unwillingness to resign. His reluctance to step down was met with skepticism from the public.

The scandal surrounding Wells Fargo's sales culture and cross-selling strategy was first documented by the Wall Street Journal as early as 2011. This early coverage highlighted the bank's aggressive sales tactics and their impact on customers.

The Los Angeles Times investigation in 2013 revealed intense pressure on bank managers and individual bankers to produce sales against impossible quotas. This pressure led to employees opening accounts without customer consent.

The American Bankruptcy Institute Journal reported that Wells Fargo employees opened as many as 1.5 million checking and savings accounts, and more than 500,000 credit cards, without customers' authorization.

Wells Fargo launched an integrated marketing campaign called "Re-Established" in 2018 to rebuild trust with customers.

The campaign referenced the bank's origins in the Old West and depicted bank employees and customers, showing a new direction for the company.

In January 2019, Wells Fargo announced another image overhaul, dubbed "This is Wells Fargo", roughly a year after the "Re-Established" campaign.

Recommended read: Wells Fargo Customers Are Suing the Bank over a Scam

The Employee and Consumer Effects of Wells Fargo Scandals were far-reaching and devastating. Approximately 85,000 accounts incurred fees totaling $2 million, and customers' credit scores were likely hurt by the fake accounts.

Customers who had accounts opened in their names without permission were also subjected to private arbitration with the bank, making it difficult for them to pursue legal action. The bank ultimately agreed to settle with these consumers for $142 million in March 2017.

Non-management Wells Fargo employees faced intense pressure to meet sales expectations, with some reporting levels of stress that led to vomiting and severe panic attacks. At least one employee consumed hand sanitizer to cope with the pressure, and others described frequent crying and severe anxiety.

Consumers were significantly affected by the unauthorized account scandal. Approximately 85,000 accounts incurred fees, totaling $2 million. These fees were likely a significant burden for many customers, and may have even hurt their credit scores.

Curious to learn more? Check out: Wells Fargo Overdraft Fees

The bank was able to prevent customers from pursuing legal action through private arbitration, but ultimately agreed to settle with consumers in March 2017. The settlement repaid fraudulent fees and paid damages to those affected, totaling $142 million.

Consumers also received refunds and compensation through various settlements. A class-action settlement paid out $142 million, while a 50-state Attorneys General settlement paid out $575 million.

Broaden your view: Bofa Settlement

Wells Fargo employees were under intense pressure, with some expected to sell as many as 20 products a day.

This pressure led to severe stress, with some employees experiencing levels of stress that caused vomiting and panic attacks.

At least one employee resorted to consuming hand sanitizer to cope with the stress.

The bank's ethics hotline was often met with inaction or even termination for employees who used it to report issues.

Wells Fargo issued defamatory U5 documents to bankers who reported branch-level malfeasance, making it difficult for them to find employment at other banks.

There's no regulatory process to appeal a defamatory U5, leaving employees to file a lawsuit against the bank.

Wells Fargo faced multiple investigations into its fraudulent practices. Prosecutors in New York City, San Francisco, and North Carolina opened their own investigations, while the Securities and Exchange Commission launched an investigation in November 2016.

Maxine Waters, chair of the House Financial Services Committee, announced her intention to investigate the bank further in early 2019, after releasing a report about the bank's malpractice. She had previously called for the government to dismantle the bank.

The Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission reached a settlement with Wells Fargo in February 2020, resulting in a $3 billion fine to address the bank's criminal and civil violations. However, this settlement does not cover any future litigation against individual employees.

The SEC filed civil charges against two former senior executives, Stumpf and Tolstead, in November 2020, accusing them of misrepresentation to investors of key performance metrics.

If this caught your attention, see: Ubs Settlement

Prosecutors in New York City, San Francisco, and North Carolina opened their own investigations into the fraud. The Securities and Exchange Commission opened its own investigation into the bank in November 2016.

Maxine Waters, chair of the House Financial Services Committee, announced her intention to investigate the bank further in early 2019. She previously released a report about the bank's malpractice.

The Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission reached a settlement with the bank in February 2020 for a total fine of US$3 billion to address the bank's criminal and civil violations. However, this settlement does not cover any future litigation against any individual employee of the bank.

In November 2020, the SEC filed civil charges against two former senior executives, Stumpf and Tolstead, accusing them of misrepresentation to investors of key performance metrics.

The Navajo Nation Lawsuit is a significant example of a company facing allegations of wrongdoing. In December 2017, the Navajo Nation sued Wells Fargo.

Wells Fargo employees allegedly told elderly members of the Navajo Nation who didn't speak English that they needed a Wells Fargo savings account to cash their checks. This was a major issue because Wells Fargo was the only bank with operations on the Navajo Nation.

The lawsuit led to a settlement in August 2019, with Wells Fargo agreeing to pay $6.5 million to the Navajo Nation.

Expand your knowledge: Wells Fargo Class Action Lawsuit Auto Loans

The Wells Fargo scandals are a stark reminder that corporate culture and compensation can have a profound impact on employee behavior.

Unrealistically high sales goals set by Wells Fargo's management led many employees to game the system, fabricating millions of fraudulent accounts to meet their targets.

The company's mantra, "Eight is great", encouraged employees to cross-sell multiple services to customers, often without their knowledge or consent.

This created a classic conflict of interest, where employees felt pressured to prioritize meeting sales targets over treating customers fairly.

Former employees described a toxic sales culture, even at headquarters, where the pressure to meet sales goals was intense.

In an effort to curb fraudulent activity, Wells Fargo attempted to change its compensation structure and held ethics workshops, but these efforts were ultimately unsuccessful.

Employees admitted to knowing what they were doing was wrong but continued to open fraudulent accounts due to the pressure to meet sales targets and the fear of losing their jobs.

This raises important questions about the role of management in creating a culture that prioritizes profits over people.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew stated that the Wells Fargo case should serve as a wake-up call for companies to prioritize culture and compensation, recognizing that how you reward and motivate employees matters.

Companies must strike a balance between incentivizing employees and over-incentivizing them, a delicate task that requires careful consideration of values and priorities.

Ultimately, Wells Fargo's scandals serve as a cautionary tale about the dangers of a cutthroat corporate culture and the importance of prioritizing ethics and customer well-being.