Which Statement about the Three Fifths Compromise Is Accurate?

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise between delegates from southern states and northern states during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The southern delegates were pushing for slaves to be counted as whole persons while the northern delegates wanted slaves to be counted as three-fifths of a person. The compromise allowed for slaves to be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purposes of taxation and representation in Congress. This compromise was a major factor in the ratification of the Constitution and the formation of the United States of America.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise between delegates from southern states and those from northern states during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The southern states wanted to count their slaves as part of the population for determining representation in Congress and the Electoral College. The northern states wanted slaves to be counted as property, not people. The Three-Fifths Compromise resulted in slaves being counted as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of apportioning seats in the House of Representatives and electoral votes.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a response to the question of how to count slaves for the purposes of taxation and representation. The southern states wanted slaves to be counted as full people because they were a large part of the southern economy and population. The northern states, on the other hand, wanted slaves to be counted as property, not people. The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way to split the difference between the two positions.

The Three-Fifths Compromise had far-reaching consequences. It formalized the idea that slaves were less than full human beings. It also increased the power of the southern states in the federal government. The Three-Fifths Compromise was an important part of the Constitution and helped to get the Constitution ratified.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was proposed by delegates from Maryland and Virginia at the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787. It was a compromise between those who wanted slaves to be counted as part of the population for the purposes of representation and those who wanted them to be counted as property. The compromise was that three-fifths of the slave population would be counted as part of the population. This compromise was enshrined in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 of the Constitution.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a controversial one, and it was one of the factors that led to the Civil War. Those who were in favor of it argued that it was a fair way to count the population, while those who were against it argued that it was a way to give Southern states more power than they deserved. In the end, the Three-Fifths Compromise was an important part of the Constitution, and it is a reminder of the difficult compromises that were necessary in order to form a more perfect union.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a proposed resolution to the issue of how slaves would be counted when determining a state’s total population for the purposes of taxation and representation in Congress. The compromise was proposed by delegates from southern states during the Constitutional Convention in 1787.

The southern delegates were concerned that if slaves were not counted at all, then their states would be at a disadvantage when it came to taxation and representation. On the other hand, if slaves were counted as full persons, then the southern states would have too much power in Congress. As a result, the Three-Fifths Compromise was proposed as a way to meet in the middle.

Under the Three-Fifths Compromise, slaves would be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purposes of taxation and representation. This meant that the southern states would have more power than if slaves were not counted at all, but not as much power as if they were counted as full persons.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was eventually enshrined in the Constitution, and it remained in effect until the Civil War. After the War, the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified, which counted slaves as full persons for the purposes of taxation and representation.

The three-fifths compromise was a constitutional agreement reached between delegates from southern slave-holding states and northern free states during the Philadelphia Convention of 1787. The compromise allowed for three-fifths of the enslaved population to be counted for representation in the House of Representatives and electoral college.

The delegates from the southern states were adamant that slaves be counted in full for representation purposes as this would give them a significant increase in power within the federal government. The delegates from the northern states, however, were not in favor of this idea as it would give the southern states an unfair advantage. As a result, a compromise was reached in which three-fifths of the slave population would be counted.

The three-fifths compromise was a key factor in determining the ratio of representation in the House of Representatives, as it allowed for slaves to be counted as part of the population. This had a significant impact on the power balance between the northern and southern states, as the southern states would have more representatives in the House than if slaves were not counted at all.

The three-fifths compromise was an important factor in the development of the United States as it allowed for a more balanced representation of the population between the northern and southern states.

The three-fifths compromise was a constitutional agreement between delegates from southern states and those from northern states during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The southern delegates wanted to count their slaves, who were property, for the purposes of representation in Congress and the electoral college. The northern delegates disagreed, arguing that slaves were not citizens and should not be counted. In order to reach a compromise, the delegates agreed that each slave would be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purposes of representation and taxation.

This compromise had a significant impact on the number of electoral votes slave states had in presidential elections. Prior to the ratification of the Constitution, each state had been allotted a certain number of electoral votes based on its population. However, with the three-fifths compromise in place, slave states were given more electoral votes than they would have had if slaves had not been counted at all. This gave them an advantage in presidential elections, as the president was elected by the electoral college.

The three-fifths compromise was a controversial agreement, and it was eventually abolished with the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868. However, it had a significant impact on the number of electoral votes slave states had in presidential elections and was an important factor in the early history of the United States.

The three-fifths compromise was an agreement reached between delegates from southern states and those from northern states during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The issue in question was whether, and if so, how, slaves would be counted when determining a state’s total population for the purposes of representation in Congress and taxation.

The southern delegates, who were in favor of counting slaves, argued that slaves were property and, as such, should be counted in the same way as other property, like land or livestock. They also pointed out that if slaves were not counted, the southern states would be disadvantaged relative to the northern states. The northern delegates, on the other hand, were opposed to counting slaves at all, arguing that slaves were not people and should not be counted as such.

After much debate, the delegates reached a compromise: slaves would be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purposes of representation and taxation. This compromise had a significant impact on the apportionment of taxes.

Under the Articles of Confederation, each state was responsible for paying an equal share of the federal government’s expenses. This system of taxation put a heavier burden on the states with larger populations. The three-fifths compromise changed this by allowing states with larger slave populations to pay a lower tax rate.

This had the effect of transferring wealth from the northern states to the southern states. It also meant that the southern states had a greater say in the federal government, as they were now disproportionately represented in Congress.

The three-fifths compromise was a major factor in the outbreak of the Civil War. The southern states felt that they were being taxed unfairly and that their interests were not being represented adequately in the federal government. The compromise also made it difficult to pass laws that would benefit the north but be disadvantageous to the south, which made it difficult to address the issue of slavery.

The three-fifths compromise was a significant factor in the apportionment of taxes and representation in the federal government. It was also a major cause of the Civil War.

The three-fifths compromise was a political agreement between delegates from southern and northern states during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The compromise figure of three-fifths was arrived at by counting each slave as three-fifths of a person. The compromise remained in effect until the end of the American Civil War, when it was abrogated by the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The origins of the three-fifths compromise can be traced back to the Continental Congress, which was tasked with coming up with a method of representation in the new government. At the time, there was a debate as to whether slaves should be counted at all, with some delegates arguing that they should not be given any representation since they were not citizens. However, other delegates from southern states argued that slaves should be counted in some capacity since they were property owners.

The three-fifths compromise was first proposed by James Madison in the Constitutional Convention. It was an attempt to find a middle ground between the two sides of the debate. Madison proposed that each slave be counted as three-fifths of a person. This compromise was accepted by the convention and became a part of the Constitution.

The three-fifths compromise remained in effect until the end of the American Civil War. At that time, it was rendered moot by the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which abolished slavery.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached between delegates from southern states and northern states during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The delegates agreed to count three-fifths of the slave population when determining a state’s total population for the purpose of apportioning the number of seats in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College. The compromise had the effect of increasing the power of southern states in the federal government relative to northern states.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a response to the issue of how to count slaves in the new United States. At the time of the Constitutional Convention, there were approximately 700,000 slaves in the United States, concentrated in the southern states. The northern states generally opposed counting slaves for the purpose of apportionment, as they believed that it would give the southern states an unfair advantage. The southern states, on the other hand, wanted slaves to be counted in order to increase their representation in the federal government.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a result of extensive negotiation between delegates from the northern and southern states. In the end, the delegates agreed to count three-fifths of the slave population when determining a state’s total population. This compromise had the effect of increasing the power of southern states in the federal government relative to northern states.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was an important step in the formation of the United States as a federal republic. The compromise helped to alleviate some of the tensions between the northern and southern states, and it played a role in determining the composition of the federal government.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was an agreement between delegates from southern and northern states during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The southern delegates were hesitant to give the federal government too much power, while the northern delegates wanted a strong central government. The compromise allowed for three-fifths of the slave population to be counted when determining a state’s total population for the purposes of representation in the House of Representatives and taxes.

If the Three-Fifths Compromise had not been reached, it is likely that the southern states would have refused to ratify the Constitution. The Constitution would have been doomed from the start, and the United States would have never come into existence. Alternatively, if the Constitution had been ratified without the Three-Fifths Compromise, the southern states would have had much more power than the northern states. The balance of power would have been shifted, and the United States would have developed very differently.

It is impossible to know exactly what would have happened if the Three-Fifths Compromise had not been reached, but it is clear that it was a very important moment in the founding of the United States.