Occupational pension funds in the EU Face Challenges and Reforms

Author

Reads 1.9K

EU Flag Swaying with the Wind
Credit: pexels.com, EU Flag Swaying with the Wind

Occupational pension funds in the EU Face Challenges and Reforms. The EU's occupational pension funds are facing significant challenges, including a decline in participation rates, which fell from 22% in 2005 to 18% in 2018.

One major challenge is the aging population, which is putting pressure on pension funds to provide for an increasing number of retirees. The average life expectancy in the EU has increased by 5 years since 2000, with 23% of the population now aged 60 or over.

Many EU countries have implemented reforms to address these challenges, including the introduction of automatic enrollment in pension schemes. This has been successful in countries such as Denmark, where participation rates have increased from 50% to 90% since the introduction of automatic enrollment in 1999.

Key Points and Reforms

The European Union has implemented various reforms to enhance the performance of occupational pension funds.

In 2019, the European Commission proposed a comprehensive reform of the EU's pension system, which included measures to improve the governance of occupational pension funds.

Credit: youtube.com, Brian Hayes MEP discusses the new EU Occupational Pension Funds Directive

Occupational pension funds in the EU are required to have a minimum level of assets under management, set at €10 million, to ensure their financial sustainability.

The EU's IORP II Directive sets out strict rules for the investment of occupational pension assets, including a requirement for pension funds to disclose their investment policies.

Investment in alternative assets, such as private equity and real estate, is allowed in certain circumstances, subject to specific risk management requirements.

Pension funds are also required to have an independent chairman and a risk management committee to ensure effective oversight of their investment strategies.

The EU's pension fund regulations aim to promote transparency and accountability among pension funds, which includes the disclosure of their investment policies and performance.

Pension funds must also have a clear and transparent remuneration policy in place, which includes the disclosure of fees and charges.

Managing Retirement Schemes

Managing retirement schemes in the EU is a complex task, but the EU has set out minimum harmonization rules to ensure occupational pension schemes are financially sound.

Credit: youtube.com, Pension funds in the EU capital markets union

The rules aim to give greater protection and information to members and beneficiaries, which is a crucial aspect of managing retirement schemes.

The EU's Directive (EU) 2016/2341 sets out these rules, which were introduced after the 2008 financial crisis.

The legislation revises and replaces Directive 2003/41/EC, which was no longer sufficient to protect pension schemes.

Industry's Concerns

Matti Leppälä, the secretary-general of the European Federation of Retirement Provision (EFRP), is seriously concerned about the plans.

The EFRP opposes Solvency II-like risk-based capital requirements, which they believe can be detrimental to pension funds and their ability to provide good quality pensions in the future.

Pension funds are not against risk-based supervision, but they want a different legislative framework that allows them to take risks in different ways.

James Walsh, senior policy adviser at the UK’s National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF), warns that the proposals will have a dramatic impact on employers.

The NAPF estimates that the plans could cost employers an additional €350 billion in the UK alone.

Credit: youtube.com, Ray Dalio: Problems of Most Pension funds

This will make it even more expensive to run pension schemes, and many will close down.

Employers will have to dig much deeper, which increases the risk of them becoming insolvent.

Michel Barnier, the European commissioner for the internal market, is trying to allay fears that occupational pension schemes are under attack.

A full impact assessment will take place to determine the substance of the pension promise, which is different from an insurance contract.

Managing Retirement Schemes

The European Union has established a set of rules to ensure occupational pension schemes are financially sound.

Directive (EU) 2016/2341 sets out minimum harmonisation rules for institutions managing collective retirement schemes for employers on behalf of their employees.

These rules aim to give greater protection and information to members and beneficiaries.

The legislation revises and replaces Directive 2003/41/EC, which needed to be updated after the 2008 financial crisis.

EU governments may introduce further measures they consider necessary to support occupational pension schemes.

The rules also encourage long-term and responsible investment in collective retirement schemes.

This legislation aims to remove obstacles to cross-border fund activity, allowing institutions to operate more freely across the EU.

Successive amendments to Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 have been incorporated into the original document.

Institutions for Directive (Iorp II)

Credit: youtube.com, What's in the latest IORP Directive?

Institutions for Directive (IORP II) aim to ensure the soundness of occupational pensions, better inform pension scheme members and beneficiaries, and promote cross-border activity.

The IORP II Directive entered into force in January 2017 and Member States had until 13 January 2019 to transpose it into national law.

Many Member States were late in their transposition, which highlights the importance of timely implementation of such directives.

The IORP II Directive is a revision of the previous Directive 2003/41/EC, which needed to be updated after the 2008 financial crisis.

Occupational pension funds or IORPs are financial institutions that manage collective retirement schemes for employers to provide retirement benefits to their employees.

IORPs are known as the "second pillar" of pension systems, which include an employer contribution.

The IORP II Directive encourages long-term and responsible investment by occupational pension funds.

It also aims to promote cross-border activity by eliminating restrictions on occupational pension funds that operate across borders.

Credit: youtube.com, The IORPII Directive | Key Considerations

The revision of the IORP framework encourages the enactment of occupational pension funds through long-term investment.

Below are the main goals of the IORP revision:

  1. Proper investment requirements to ensure sufficient funds.
  2. Better transparency to each Member State and beneficiary through statements regarding funds received.
  3. Elimination of restrictions on occupational pension funds which operate cross borders.

European Pension Products

The EU has laws in place to protect your supplementary pension rights if you move to another EU country for work. Directive 2014/50/EU ensures you won't lose benefits you've already acquired in your existing company or occupational pension scheme.

In some cases, you might consider a Pan-European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) as an additional option. The PEPP is an optional instrument that's complementary to existing state-based, occupational, and national personal pensions.

A PEPP can be distributed by insurance intermediaries or investment firms, and all providers must offer "Basic PEPPs" with capital protection and costs that don't exceed 1% of the accumulated capital per year.

Effects of Global Financial Crisis

The global financial crisis had a significant impact on occupational pension funds in the EU. On average, countries with defined benefit (DB) plans experienced at least a 10% decrease in benefits due to the crisis.

Credit: youtube.com, Money Minute: European Banks, Pensions, Paulson

Many workers who were nearing retirement were affected by the crisis, making it more difficult for them to save for retirement and receive occupational pension funds. The crisis highlighted the vulnerabilities of pension systems across Member States.

Fully funded pension schemes were not immune to the effects of the crisis, showing that they could not entirely provide a reliable basis for benefits received after retirement.

Elena Feeney-Jacobs

Junior Writer

Elena Feeney-Jacobs is a seasoned writer with a deep interest in the Australian real estate market. Her insightful articles have shed light on the operations of major real estate companies and investment trusts, providing readers with a comprehensive understanding of the industry. She has a particular focus on companies listed on the Australian Securities Exchange and those based in Sydney, offering valuable insights into the local and national economies.

Love What You Read? Stay Updated!

Join our community for insights, tips, and more.