What is a Model Audit and Why is it Important

A model audit is a thorough examination of a machine learning model's performance, data, and code to ensure it's working as intended and meets the required standards. This involves identifying potential biases, errors, and areas for improvement.

A model audit is important because it helps organizations avoid deploying models that may discriminate against certain groups or make inaccurate predictions. In fact, a study found that up to 70% of models have some level of bias, which can lead to serious consequences.

By conducting regular audits, organizations can catch these issues early on and make necessary adjustments to ensure their models are fair, transparent, and reliable.

A model audit is an important task in financial modeling that helps ensure errors are eliminated or reduced.

It's commonly requested by banks and corporations to check the accuracy of their models.

The goal of a model audit is to reassure lenders and investors that the models can be relied upon to make informed decisions.

A model audit is also known as a model review, and it's essential for maintaining mathematical integrity in financial models.

It helps eliminate or reduce model or spreadsheet errors, ensuring that calculations are accurate.

The purpose of a model audit is to provide assurance that the results can be relied upon, and the party conducting the review will provide a level of reliance on the form of an amount of liability, which may range from a multiple of the fee to a fixed amount, often up to US$20 million.

This liability cap can be a multiple of the audit fee, such as 2×, 3×, or 4× fee, or a fixed amount, and it's essential to note that the model audit is not an insurance policy, but rather a way to reduce financial risk.

The objective of the model audit is to reduce financial risk that is being taken on by the organization, and the scope of the audit should be specific to ensure that the relevant tasks are completed correctly.

A full-scope model audit typically includes a review of the model's logic, consistency with financial and contractual documentation, consistency with relevant accounting and tax requirements, and a sensitivity review.

Here are the typical elements included in a full-scope model audit:

The purpose of a model audit is to provide assurance that the results can be relied upon, with the auditor offering a level of reliance in the form of an amount of liability, which may range from a multiple of the fee to a fixed amount, often up to US$20 million.

A model audit aims to reduce financial risk by identifying material errors in the financial model. This is more important than negotiating a liability cap if errors are not identified. The model audit is not an insurance policy, but rather a way to reduce financial risk.

In the event of an error or omission due to the auditor's negligence, the organization relying on the report may choose to sue the auditor to recover any loss, which could be significant. The auditor's liability cap is often a multiple of the audit fee, such as 2×, 3×, or 4× fee.

Model audits have primarily been related to project finance and infrastructure finance, including Public–private partnership (PPP) transactions, such as PFI in the UK and P3 in the USA.

A full-scope model audit typically includes a review of the model's logic, consistency with financial and contractual documentation, consistency with relevant accounting and tax requirements, and a sensitivity review.

The scope of a model audit is specific and focused on ensuring that spreadsheet errors are corrected. It includes reviewing the logic used in the model, checking for consistency in calculations and documentation, ensuring the model is consistent with accounting and taxation rules, and checking the model's sensitivity.

The audit's objectives are to provide assurance that the financial model is accurate and effective, and to confirm or deny that the model does what it is expected to do. This involves reviewing the model's assumptions and ensuring that any errors are minimal and won't cause a material impact on the business's projects.

A model audit's scope can be categorized into two main types: high-level review and formal model audit. The high-level review includes reviewing the model's logic and integrity, examining consistency of P&L, cash flow, and balance sheet projections, and reviewing the use of key financial indicators.

A different take: A Firm's Net Cash Flow from Operating Activities Includes

Here are the key elements of a high-level review:

A formal model audit, on the other hand, includes all the elements of a high-level review, plus additional checks and analysis. This includes checking the integrity and logic of the entire model, matching every model assumption against supporting information, and fully checking all model assumptions against local GAAP or IFRS accounting standards and relevant tax legislation.

Operis is the only firm that truly specialises in model auditing, performing over a hundred model audits for clients worldwide each year.

Their concentrated focus on model auditing allows them to deploy a deeper understanding of the modelling process, uncovering more issues than consultants or firms with broader service lines or less experience.

Operis consultants are able to offer some of the highest liability levels in the market, underlining the reputational weight of a model audit signed off by Operis.

Gridlines' unique approach combines meticulous attention to detail with a streamlined process that eliminates traditional auditing pains like frustrating delays and endless back-and-forth.

Their model audit process provides crystal-clear insights and a clear path forward, ensuring projects proceed with precision and ease.

Operis consultants teach industry participants how to build and audit models, and are available for advice on building models, auditing finished models, and accounting and tax issues surrounding project finance.

Expand your knowledge: Bookkeeping Accounting Auditing Clerks

Conducting a model audit involves reviewing a financial model produced using spreadsheet software, typically Microsoft Excel. Most models contain sheets for input data, formulas, and outputs, usually in the form of financial statements.

A model auditor may undertake a detailed 'bottom-up' review, checking each unique formula cell by cell, or a 'top-down' analysis based on the project's documentation. The debate is whether a "cell-by-cell" or performance approach is most appropriate, but often a combination of both is used.

Model auditors conduct a bottom-up review, or a cell-by-cell check of every formula, to ensure accuracy. This approach is crucial in identifying potential errors or inconsistencies.

A top-down analysis of the model is also possible, examining the performance of calculations based on the project's documentation. This can provide a broader understanding of the model's overall performance.

Readers also liked: When Analyzing an Investment Project Uncertain Future Cash Flows

Improper or inconsistent formatting can lead to substantial errors in a financial model. This can be avoided by following best practices, such as using a blue font for hardcoded numbers and black font for formulas and calculations.

Using long, complex formulas is another common mistake that can lead to errors. Breaking up a long formula into multiple, simpler formulas can help avoid errors and make model audits quicker.

A consistent sign convention is crucial in financial models. Switching positive and negative signs around can be difficult to catch during model audits, and using inconsistent signs can lead to miscalculations.

Here are some common model errors to watch out for:

Common Errors in Financial Models can be a real headache. Improper or inconsistent formatting is a major issue, making it difficult to audit and identify errors.

Using a blue font for hardcoded numbers and black font for formulas and calculations is a best practice, but it's often ignored or applied inconsistently. This can lead to substantial errors or errors that are hard to catch.

Using long, complex formulas is another common mistake. The longer and more complex the formula, the more prone to error it is. Breaking up a long formula into multiple, simpler formulas can help avoid errors and make model audits faster.

For another approach, see: Shareholder Value Formula

A consistent sign convention is also crucial. Some models use negative numbers for expenses, while others use positive numbers. If a proper sign convention is not followed, the model may miscalculate certain metrics.

Here are some common sign convention mistakes to watch out for:

TransAlta's Misalignment is a cautionary tale about the importance of double-checking your work, especially when it comes to data entry. A simple mistake by an employee led to a $24 million loss for the company.

TransAlta's loss of $24 million was a direct result of a misaligned row in an Excel model, which reduced their 2003 profit by 10%. This highlights the potential consequences of errors in data analysis.

In this case, the employee's mistake was caused by copying and pasting data into the Excel model, which can be a common pitfall. It's essential to verify data entry and model alignment to avoid similar issues.

See what others are reading: Stock Options Employee Benefit