Fairfield Greenwich Group: A Legacy of Controversy and Lawsuits

Fairfield Greenwich Group, a private investment firm, was founded in 1982 by Sonny and Peter Scaramucci.

The firm was known for its aggressive sales tactics, which led to numerous complaints from investors.

Fairfield Greenwich Group was also involved in the Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC scandal, which resulted in billions of dollars in losses for investors.

The firm's involvement in the scandal led to several lawsuits, including one filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 2009.

A different take: Fairfield Greenwich Advisors

Fairfield Greenwich Group was founded by Walter Noel, a 78-year-old man with a master's degree in economics and a law degree from Harvard.

The company established itself primarily as a marketing entity, with Noel meeting Bernie Madoff in the early 1980s and their businesses growing symbiotically.

Fairfield Greenwich Group's website doesn't even mention Madoff, instead extolling the firm's comprehensive and sophisticated screening techniques for selecting top money managers.

The firm charged clients an annual fee of 1 percent of assets invested, in addition to a fee of 20 percent on investment gains each year, which paid out $70 million annually for a $7 billion investment.

Fairfield Greenwich Group's preferred access to Bernie Madoff's ponzi scheme was making the firm $150 million a year.

Readers also liked: Patelco Credit Union Fairfield California

Fairfield Greenwich Group was essentially a marketing vehicle for Bernie Madoff's Ponzi scheme.

The firm's founder, Walter Noel, had a background in banking and law, and he worked with Madoff as early as the 1980s. Their businesses grew symbiotically, with Noel serving as a salesman for Madoff's funds.

Fairfield's website didn't even mention Madoff, instead touting the firm's comprehensive screening techniques for selecting top money managers.

The firm's clients paid an annual fee of 1 percent of assets invested, plus a 20 percent fee on investment gains. This meant that an investment of $7 billion paid the firm $70 million annually, and an additional $140 million in a year with a 10 percent gain.

The fees were galling because Fairfield barely performed any due diligence on the funds it recommended. In fact, one hedge fund consultant found it statistically impossible to replicate Madoff's returns, which were suspiciously similar to those of the Bayou fund, a fund that was later prosecuted for fraud.

Check this out: Cottonwood Technology Fund

The Fairfield Greenwich Group was involved in a major financial scandal, resulting in a $7.2 billion lawsuit against the firm.

The lawsuit was filed by the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, which claimed that Fairfield Greenwich Group had misrepresented the performance of a hedge fund managed by Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities.

The firm's financial issues were further exacerbated by a lack of transparency and oversight, which allowed the Madoff Ponzi scheme to continue unchecked for years.

Fairfield's fee arrangement was quite lucrative, earning them approximately $400 million from 2005 to 2008.

They charged clients larger fees than most similar firms, including a 20% share of profits on investments, about double what competitors charged.

This arrangement raised suspicions among other money managers, who wondered why Madoff wouldn't charge additional fees, unlike most others on Wall Street.

Madoff allegedly charged a commission on trades he executed, which was unusual and left many questioning his motives.

Massachusetts regulators alleged that in 2007, Tucker earned more than $30 million in fees from Madoff.

Fairfield Greenwich's relationship with Bernie Madoff was built on a house of cards. They ignored numerous red flags, including the fact that Madoff only reported four losing months in 14 years.

Madoff's steady returns were suspiciously consistent, with a 45-degree angle rise in returns, which is impossible in the volatile world of finance. This is equivalent to a baseball player with a .960 batting average or an NFL team going 96–4 over a 100-game span.

Madoff over-hedged his trades for Fairfield Sentry, buying more options than necessary to generate profits, a clear violation of his contract. This led to an astonishing $95 million in earnings in May 2008, all from over-hedging.

Even a financial consultant noticed that Madoff was on the winning side of every trade, which is simply not possible, even for a skilled trader. He suggested that Fairfield Greenwich officials investigate who was trading with Madoff and verify the assets he claimed to hold, but they didn't follow up.

Fairfield Greenwich was aware as early as 2005 that Madoff was being audited by a small accounting firm with only one full-time accountant. This lack of scrutiny should have raised more red flags than it did.

This alleged behavior was brought to light during Markopolos' testimony on February 4, 2009.

Walter Noel's firm, Fairfield Greenwich Group, is facing a $3.2 billion lawsuit from Irving Picard, the court-appointed trustee responsible for liquidating Bernie Madoff's investment firm.

Noel's messy legal situation just got messier, and he'll likely have to juggle his golf game and lawyer consultations this summer.

In September 2008, Banque Bénédict Hentsch merged with Fairfield Greenwich Group to create an $18 billion venture in combined assets.

The merger was intended to give clients access to each other's funds and wealth management services. Banque Bénédict Hentsch's founder and chairman, Bénédict Hentsch, and Robert Pennone became directors of Fairfield Greenwich Group, while Charles Murphy and Mark McKeefry joined the board of Banque Bénédict Hentsch Fairfield Partners SA.

The bank had $2 billion in assets at the time of the merger. Fairfield Greenwich Group brought significant assets to the table, but the merger ultimately didn't work out.

In mid-December 2008, the merger was terminated due to the Madoff crisis, which put $47.5 million of client assets at risk.

Discover more: Banque Nationale De Développement Agricole

As recently as December 11, 2008, Madoff was working with Fairfield Greenwich to raise money for new funds, which promised about a 16% return, using more leverage than the 3–1 ratios he claimed he used in existing funds.

Fairfield warned investors they would be excluded from any future Madoff product if they declined to participate in the new fund and/or withdrew from any existing funds.

Madoff was still actively raising new funds, even on the day he was taken into federal custody, which is a shocking reminder of his brazen and deceitful tactics.

The leverage used in these new funds was significantly higher than what Madoff claimed to use in his existing funds, which is a stark contrast to the promises he made to his investors.

Charles Murphy, an executive involved in these new funds, was later implicated in the scandal and ultimately took his own life in 2017.

It looks like the folks behind Fairfield Greenwich Group are really feeling the pinch. Walter Noel and Jeffrey Tucker have put their private jet up for sale.

The financial struggles of the Fairfield Greenwich Group founders are starting to show. They're now selling off their horse farm in upstate New York.

Melanie Tucker, Jeffrey's wife, has had to cut back on her expensive hobby, bridge.

Walter Noel's legal troubles just got a lot worse. He's being sued for $3.2 billion by Irving Picard, the trustee responsible for recovering Madoff's victims' funds.

The lawsuit is against Noel's firm, Fairfield Greenwich Group. This is a big deal, and it's clear that Noel is in a tough spot.

The lawsuit aims to recoup funds for Madoff's victims. This is a major development in the ongoing effort to make those affected by Madoff's Ponzi scheme whole again.

Noel may have to juggle golf and lawyer calls this summer.

Intriguing read: Gramercy Funds Management

Investors were shocked by the news of Fairfield Greenwich Group's involvement in the Madoff Ponzi scheme.

Many investors lost significant sums of money due to the scheme, with some losing their entire life savings.

The collapse of the scheme led to a significant decline in investor confidence in hedge funds.

Investors began to question the integrity and oversight of hedge fund managers.

Take a look at this: Viking Global Investors

Fairfield Greenwich was a defendant in a class action lawsuit seeking to recoup losses from investments with Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities.

The class action was a result of consolidating multiple cases filed in federal and state court against Fairfield Greenwich, with a second amended consolidated complaint filed on September 29, 2009.

The complaint named multiple defendants, including Citco, the fund administrator and sub-custodian of the funds, and PricewaterhouseCoopers, the auditor of the funds.

The complaint alleged various violations, including fraud, violations of Rule 10b-5, and breach of fiduciary duty.

Fairfield Greenwich settled a lawsuit with the Anwar plaintiffs in 2016, paying $235 million.

In the case of Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich, the court found that the fund administrators had a duty of care towards the investors.

Fairfield Greenwich was also a defendant in a lawsuit filed in Miami against PricewaterhouseCoopers Ireland by investors in a fund marketed by Banco Santander SA, which lost an estimated $3 billion.

On July 20, 2009, Justice Edward Alexander Bannister granted the request to liquidate the Fairfield Sentry funds, worth more than $7.2 billion in December 2008.

Spanish anticorruption prosecutors investigated Fairfield Greenwich to determine what they knew about Madoff's fraudulent funds when they sold them to Spanish clients.

Both Greenwich Sentry, L.P. and Greenwich Sentry Partners, L.P. voluntarily filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in New York on November 19, 2010.

A different take: D. L. Evans Bank

Harry Markopolos made some eye-opening testimony before a House subcommittee looking into the Madoff affair. His accusations included Walter Noel's Fairfield Greenwich Group going on a "three-year auditing shopping spree".

Markopolos also revealed that The Wall Street Journal missed numerous chances to break the Madoff story open. This is a significant claim, especially from a reputable news source.

The reaction to Obama's plan to cap Wall Street pay has been all over the map, with some questioning whether it could even work.

Explore further: Cassa Centrale Banca - Credito Cooperativo Italiano