Conditional tail expectation plays a crucial role in risk assessment and premium calculation. It's a key concept in understanding the potential losses that can occur in an insurance portfolio.
The conditional tail expectation is calculated as the expected value of the tail of the distribution, given that the loss exceeds a certain threshold. This is expressed as ETX = E[X|X > u], where ETX is the conditional tail expectation, E is the expectation operator, X is the loss, and u is the threshold.
In practice, the conditional tail expectation is used to determine the expected amount of a loss that exceeds a certain level of severity. For example, if the threshold is $100,000, the conditional tail expectation would be the expected amount of a loss that exceeds $100,000.
The conditional tail expectation is a valuable tool for insurance companies to assess the risk of their portfolios and calculate premiums accordingly. By understanding the potential losses that can occur, insurance companies can better manage their risk and provide more accurate quotes to their customers.
See what others are reading: Conditional Statement
Frequently Asked Questions
What does CTE 95 mean?
CTE 95 refers to the worst 5% of scenarios, representing the average amount of assets needed to satisfy obligations over a contract or policy's life. This metric helps assess potential financial risks and liabilities.
What is the difference between conditional tail expectation and expected shortfall?
TVaR (Conditional Tail Expectation) and Expected Shortfall are two related but distinct measures of risk, with TVaR focusing on the expected loss above a threshold and Expected Shortfall being the product of that threshold and its probability of occurrence. Understanding the difference between these two metrics is crucial for accurately assessing and managing risk in various fields.
Sources
- (PDF) Estimating conditional tail expectation with actuarial ... (academia.edu)
- Improved Estimator of the Conditional Tail Expectation in ... (iapress.org)
- Google Scholar (google.com)
- Google Scholar (google.com)
- Google Scholar (google.com)
- CrossRef (doi.org)
- Google Scholar (google.com)
- Google Scholar (google.com)
- Google Scholar (google.com)
- Google Scholar (google.com)
- Google Scholar (google.com)
- Google Scholar (google.com)
- Google Scholar (google.com)
- Google Scholar (google.com)
- Google Scholar (google.com)
- CTE (Conditional Tail Expectation) - AltExploit - WordPress.com (wordpress.com)
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-021-09888-0 (doi.org)
- https://doi.org/10.1214/aop/1176995158 (doi.org)
- https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3781596 (doi.org)
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2018.1506705 (doi.org)
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03610929508831631 (doi.org)
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4149(78)90056-X (doi.org)
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-259X(87)90155-2 (doi.org)
- https://doi.org/10.3905/jfi.2003.319362 (doi.org)
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2009.10597570 (doi.org)
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2007.10597479 (doi.org)
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2020.1831934 (doi.org)
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11009-021-09881-7 (doi.org)
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2020.1855199 (doi.org)
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.05.007 (doi.org)
- https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2020.23 (doi.org)
- https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2019.24 (doi.org)
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2018.11.012 (doi.org)
- https://doi.org/10.2307/3215209 (doi.org)
- https://doi.org/10.3390/risks1010014 (doi.org)
- https://doi.org/10.1214/13-PS221 (doi.org)
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2022.11.003 (doi.org)
Featured Images: pexels.com
