Audits are a routine examination of a company's financial records to ensure accuracy and compliance with laws and regulations.
The primary goal of an audit is to verify the financial statements and provide an opinion on their fairness and accuracy.
Forensic accounting, on the other hand, involves investigating financial irregularities and identifying potential crimes such as embezzlement or money laundering.
This specialized field requires a deep understanding of accounting principles and investigative techniques to uncover hidden financial information.
What is Accounting?
Accounting is a vital function that helps organizations make informed decisions about their finances. It's a specialization within accounting that involves examining and evaluating financial records to derive evidence used in a court of law or legal proceeding.
Forensic accountants, also known as Certified Fraud Examiners (CFEs), are experts in this field. They conduct forensic audits to investigate potential crimes or assist with legal cases.
A forensic audit is an examination of financial records to find any illegal financial activity. The term "forensic" in this context means suitable for use in courts or public discussion and debate.
Forensic audits are often conducted to prosecute a party for fraud, embezzlement, or other financial crimes. In the process of a forensic audit, the auditor may be called to serve as an expert witness during trial proceedings.
Forensic audits are designed to investigate potential crimes or assist with legal cases. They can help identify fraudulent activities or prepare for legal proceedings.
Here are some key aspects of forensic audits:
- Conducted by Certified Fraud Examiners (CFEs) or forensic accountants
- Designed to investigate potential crimes or assist with legal cases
- Often used when financial crimes are suspected
- Can help identify fraudulent activities or prepare for legal proceedings
- Results are prepared with the understanding that they may be presented in court
Audit vs Forensic Accounting
Forensic accounting and auditing are often confused with each other, but they have distinct differences. Both disciplines require a thorough knowledge of accounting principles and basics, and are carried out by professionals with a degree in accountancy.
Auditors owe primary allegiance to the investing public, ensuring shareholders are not duped into parting with their cash on the basis of falsified financial statements. Their remit is often general in nature.
A financial audit is defined as "the examination of an entity's financial statement and accompanying disclosure by an independent auditor." It's designed to provide a picture of the financial health and performance of public companies, and is required by the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) for all public companies.
A forensic audit, on the other hand, is an examination of financial records to find any illegal financial activity. It employs different investigative techniques than those used in a financial audit and gathers evidence for use in a civil or criminal court of law.
Choosing between a forensic vs internal audit depends on your organization's specific situation and goals. Consider the trigger: a forensic audit is likely necessary if you're responding to suspected fraud or preparing for potential legal action.
Here's a simple way to determine which type of audit you need:
A forensic audit requires a written report about the fraud to be presented to the client to proceed to file a legal case if they so desire. The report should include the findings of the investigation, a summary of the evidence collected, an explanation of how the fraud was perpetrated, and suggestions for preventing similar frauds in the future.
In summary, forensic accounting and auditing have distinct differences. While auditing focuses on ensuring the financial statements are presented fairly, forensic accounting focuses on investigating and gathering evidence of illegal financial activity.
Collecting Evidence
Collecting evidence is a crucial step in any forensic audit. The evidence collected should be adequate to prove the fraudster's identity in court, reveal the fraud scheme's details, and document the financial loss suffered and the parties affected by the fraud.
A logical flow of evidence will help the court in understanding the fraud and the evidence presented. Forensic auditors are required to take precautions to ensure that documents and other evidence collected are not damaged or altered by anyone.
The evidence collected should be enough to prove the fraudster's identity, reveal the details of the fraud scheme, and document the financial loss and parties affected. This means gathering relevant documents, records, and other evidence that can be used in court.
Forensic auditors must take steps to preserve the integrity of the evidence, just like in Example 2: "Collecting Evidence". They should also keep in mind that the evidence they collect will be used to prove the fraud in court.
Here are some key steps to consider when collecting evidence:
- Gathering relevant documents and records
- Preserving the integrity of the evidence
- Ensuring that documents and other evidence are not damaged or altered
- Collecting evidence that can be used to prove the fraudster's identity
- Documenting the financial loss suffered and the parties affected by the fraud
Court Proceedings
In court proceedings, a forensic auditor plays a crucial role in explaining the evidence collected and how the team identified the suspect(s).
They must be present during these proceedings to simplify complex accounting issues and explain the case in a layperson's language.
This ensures that people without a background in legal or accounting terms can understand the fraud clearly.
The auditor's goal is to communicate the evidence in a way that's easy to grasp, even for those unfamiliar with financial concepts.
Understanding the Difference is Essential
A forensic audit is not just a regular audit, it's a specialized examination that's designed to uncover evidence of criminal behavior, such as fraud or embezzlement.
Typically, a forensic audit is conducted by a public accounting firm, but it's essential to choose the right option for your organization's needs, as many organizational leaders may have limited experience with specialized audits.
A forensic audit is used to gather evidence that could potentially be used in court, whereas a regular audit provides assurance regarding an organization's financial statements.
Internal audits, on the other hand, help identify areas for improvement within a company, making them a valuable tool for organizational growth and development.
If you suspect that you or your company have been the victim of fraud, it's essential to seek expert assistance at your earliest opportunity, as only a specialist forensic accountant will have the specific training, knowledge, and skills required to carry out the work and bring the case to a satisfactory conclusion.
Here are some key takeaways to help you understand the difference between a forensic audit and a regular audit:
- A forensic audit is an examination and evaluation of a firm's or individual's financial records.
- During a forensic audit, an auditor seeks to derive evidence that could potentially be used in court.
- A forensic audit is used to uncover criminal behavior such as fraud or embezzlement.
- Forensic audit investigations can uncover or confirm various types of illegal activities.
Accounting Basics and Situations
Accounting basics are a crucial foundation for both auditing and forensic accounting. Both disciplines require a thorough knowledge and understanding of accounting principles and basics. Professionals who hold a degree in accountancy are typically involved in both fields.
Forensic accountants and auditors also use essential procedures and techniques of computation, analysis, and book-keeping. Auditors, however, owe primary allegiance to the investing public to ensure that shareholders are not being duped into parting with their cash on the basis of falsified financial statements.
Accounting Basics
Forensic accounting and auditing both require a thorough knowledge and understanding of accounting principles and basics. This is a fundamental requirement for professionals in both fields.
Both forensic accounting and auditing are carried out by professionals who hold a degree in accountancy. This is a common thread that runs through both disciplines.
Auditors and forensic accountants use essential procedures and techniques of computation, analysis, and book-keeping. This is a crucial aspect of their work.
The primary allegiance of auditors is to the investing public, to ensure that shareholders are not being duped into parting with their cash on the basis of falsified financial statements. This is an ongoing responsibility.
All auditors are accountants, but not all accountants are auditors. This distinction is important to understand.
Common Accounting Situations
As you navigate the world of accounting, you'll likely encounter certain situations that require professional intervention. A discrepancy between assets and liabilities that can't be explained is a common red flag.
You might also notice that reconciliation of accounts finds unusual results, which can be a sign of something amiss. This could be due to a range of factors, including fraud or theft.
In cases where a business has been hacked and/or personal information has been stolen, an expert's help is essential. Similarly, if a whistleblower raises concerns about stolen assets or other issues, an accountant can provide valuable guidance.
Here are some common accounting situations that may require professional assistance:
- Suspected cases of fraud or theft
- Unexplained discrepancies between assets and liabilities
- Unusual results from account reconciliation
- Unresolved debts that should have been settled
- Business hacking or personal information theft
- Whistleblower concerns about stolen assets or other issues
In addition to these scenarios, you may also encounter situations where projects can't be completed without specialist intervention, or where regulatory changes have created operating risks.
Sources
- https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/forensic-audit.asp
- https://www.eidebailly.com/insights/articles/2019/3/forensic-audit-vs-internal-audit
- https://blog.rodefermoss.com/rm/financial-and-forensic-auditors-the-same-but-different
- https://www.eidebailly.com/insights/articles/2019/3/forensic-audit-vs-financial-audit
- https://inquesta.co.uk/blog/forensic-accounting-vs-auditing/
Featured Images: pexels.com