
If a life insurance policy is owned by a third party, it can be a bit confusing to understand the benefits and implications. You can't just assume the policy is yours to do with as you please, even if you're the one paying the premiums.
The third party, typically a business or organization, has a vested interest in the policy and may have specific goals in mind for its use. For example, they might be using the policy to secure a loan or as a form of employee benefit.
You'll need to carefully review the policy documents and any agreements you've signed to understand your role and responsibilities. This will help you avoid any misunderstandings or missteps down the line.
A unique perspective: Third Party Insurance Claim Settlement
What Is Stranger-Owned?
A life insurance policy owned by a third party can be a complex and sensitive topic. Stranger-owned life insurance, also known as STOLI, is a type of policy that raises red flags.
STOLI policies are bought by investors who have no existing relationship with the insured person. These investors are essentially buying life insurance as an investment, not because they'd suffer financially if the insured person died. This uncomfortable arrangement makes STOLI policies generally illegal.
In a STOLI arrangement, an investor group initiates the insured's application and will likely acquire an interest in the life of the participant. This is not a traditional life insurance policy, where the consumer initiates the application and their loved ones are beneficiaries.
STOLI arrangements are often promoted to consumers between the ages of 65 and 85, and can take various forms, such as:
- Allowing someone to purchase life insurance on your life in exchange for an immediate lump sum payment of some amount;
- Allowing someone to purchase insurance on your life in exchange for a partial payment of the policy's face value to your beneficiaries upon your death;
- Entering into a contract for "free" or "no-cost" insurance on your life; or
- Purchasing a life insurance policy for the sole purpose of selling the policy to a third-party, whether immediately or in the future.
These arrangements are broadly illegal, and many schemes include fraudulent financial reporting. For example, a senior citizen uses falsely exaggerated financial numbers to purchase an extremely large life insurance policy.
See what others are reading: Symetra Financial Ratings
Types of Stranger-Owned Arrangements
Stranger-owned life insurance arrangements are broadly illegal and often involve fraudulent financial reporting. These arrangements typically involve a third-party investor buying a life insurance policy on someone who has no insurable interest in their life.
You might like: B Owns a Whole Life Policy
STOLI arrangements are often marketed under the guise of "zero premium life insurance" or "estate maximization plans", but they're essentially a way for investors to gamble on the lives of others. This is considered unethical and is against the law in many states.
There's a key difference between STOLI arrangements and viaticals. Viaticals involve a person who already owns life insurance selling their policy to a third-party investor, usually for a cash payment. This is a legal practice, but it's not the same as STOLI.
Here are some key differences between STOLI arrangements and viaticals:
In contrast to STOLI arrangements, buying life insurance for someone else requires proving insurable interest and getting consent from the person being insured.
Criticisms and Controversies
STOLI arrangements are broadly illegal, and many schemes include fraudulent financial reporting.
The insurable-interest requirement is in place to prevent policyholders from benefiting from someone's death, which can create an unethical situation.
Corporate-owned life insurance, on the other hand, is legal and considered more ethical because it's based on the financial value of the employee to the company.
H.H. Holmes, a notorious serial killer, even used life insurance policies to benefit from his employees' deaths, highlighting the potential risks of STOLI.
Family members, business owners, and employers typically have insurable interest in the lives of others, making it more acceptable to buy life insurance on their behalf.
STOLI policies are considered unethical because they allow investors to gamble on the lives of others, often using false financial information to secure large policies.
The consent of the insured is usually required before issuing a life insurance policy, to prevent someone from buying insurance on your life without your knowledge or agreement.
STOLI arrangements often involve a third-party investor covering premiums in exchange for a large life insurance policy that pays a tax-free benefit when the insured dies.
For another approach, see: An Insured Has a Life Insurance Policy That Requires
Legal and Regulatory Aspects

In the context of a life insurance policy owned by a third party, it's essential to understand the legal and regulatory aspects involved.
The policy owner's rights are protected under the Insurance Contracts Act 1984, which requires insurers to act in good faith and provide clear information to policy owners.
A third-party policy owner may have limited control over the policy, but they can still make changes to the policy, such as assigning the policy to a new beneficiary.
The policy owner is responsible for paying premiums and ensuring the policy remains in force, but they may also be able to claim benefits if the policyholder passes away.
To assign a policy, the policy owner must provide written notice to the insurer, which can take up to 30 days to process.
If this caught your attention, see: S Is Covered by a Whole Life Policy
Special Considerations
In some cases, a third-party owner of a life insurance policy may attempt to artificially create insurable interest by granting the insured a loan. This can be done to fulfill the insurable interest requirement, which is a common workaround.
The IRS and state governments have a negative view of this practice, known as STOLI, and insurance companies are becoming increasingly vigilant in detecting it.
A fresh viewpoint: Insurable Interest Life Insurance
Trusts and Irrevocable Trusts
An irrevocable life insurance trust, or ILIT, is a type of trust that can't be changed or canceled once created.
ILITs are a common choice among high-net-worth individuals whose estates exceed the federal estate tax threshold.
Since the policy is owned by the trust and not the insured, the proceeds from it aren't subject to the federal estate tax.
Irrevocable trusts can hold the cash value of a whole life policy, which means those assets will remain with the trust.
Suggestion: Is a Life Insurance Policy Part of an Estate
Sources
- https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/stranger-owned-life-insurance-stoli.asp
- https://www.actec.org/resource-center/video/understanding-life-insurance-policy-ownership/
- https://idoi.illinois.gov/consumers/consumerinsurance/lifeannuities/stranger-originated-life-insurance-stoli.html
- https://www.progressive.com/answers/what-is-life-insurance-trust/
- https://www.aflac.com/resources/life-insurance/can-you-take-out-life-insurance-on-anyone.aspx
Featured Images: pexels.com