5 3 Bank Fined Millions for Fake Accounts and Auto Repossessions

The bank was slapped with a hefty fine for its role in creating fake accounts and engaging in auto repossessions without proper authorization.

The fine was a result of a lengthy investigation into the bank's practices, which found that employees had been creating fake accounts in customers' names without their knowledge or consent.

The bank's actions were not only a breach of trust but also a clear violation of consumer protection laws.

The fine was a significant blow to the bank's reputation, and it will likely take a long time to recover from the damage.

Fifth Third Bank has been accused of opening fake accounts, charging customers $12.7 million in illegal fees, and even getting customers' cars illegally repossessed.

The bank's employees were incentivized to meet sales goals, which led them to create fake accounts to hit their targets. This practice went on for years, despite warnings from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

The CFPB has caught Fifth Third Bank illegally loading up auto loan bills with excessive charges, resulting in nearly 1,000 families losing their cars to repossession.

Customers who were affected by the bank's actions will receive refunds, but the bank will have to come up with a plan to get compensation to those who have not already been repaid.

The settlement requires Fifth Third Bank to pay $20 million in penalties, with $15 million for opening fake accounts and $5 million for the car loan problems.

Here are the key facts about the Fifth Third Bank scandal:

The investigation into the 5/3 bank fraud was a complex and lengthy process. Investigators found that the bank's lax security measures made it easy for scammers to steal millions.

The lawsuit filed against 5/3 bank was a class-action suit, meaning it represented thousands of customers who had been affected by the fraud. The suit alleged that the bank had failed to protect its customers' accounts.

A key piece of evidence in the case was a report from the bank's own security team, which revealed that the bank had been aware of the security risks for months before the fraud occurred. The report highlighted the bank's failure to take adequate action to prevent the scam.

The lawsuit resulted in a significant settlement for the affected customers, with the bank agreeing to pay out millions of dollars in damages.

Fifth Third Bank charged customers $12.7 million in worthless fees for duplicative auto insurance coverage.

These fees were for cars already insured by another company, or for coverage that was purchased within 30 days of a lapse in prior coverage.

The bank's auto insurance practice was in place for years, according to the CFPB.

Fifth Third customers who were hit with these bogus charges may have had their cars repossessed due to unpaid fees.

Suggestion: Health Insurance Fraud

The bank voluntarily discontinued its auto insurance practice in January 2019, before the CFPB began investigating the company.

Fifth Third was fined $20 million for this practice, which is relatively small compared to the bank's $62 billion in assets under management.

The fine is expected to save the bank money in the long run by avoiding litigation costs.

Fifth Third was faulted by the CFPB for charging duplicate, unnecessary collateral protection insurance to over 37,000 customers.

The bank threatened borrowers with delinquency, extra fees, and repossession if they declined the coverage that was not required. The CFPB said that in some cases, Fifth Third went ahead with vehicle repossessions when charges for unneeded coverage directly caused the borrower's delinquency.

Borrowers paid more than $12.7 million in unlawful fees related to car insurance. This is a staggering amount that could have been avoided if the bank had not engaged in this practice.

Intriguing read: What Bank Does Not Check Chexsystems

The bank's collateral protection insurance program was discontinued in January 2019, but the damage had already been done. The CFPB said that more than half of the affected customers had either maintained their coverage or obtained it within 30 days of the policy lapsing.

Fifth Third applied refunds to the consumers' outstanding loan balances instead of refunding the money. This is a clear example of the bank prioritizing its own interests over the needs of its customers.

The CFPB's settlement with Fifth Third resolves both the sales practices litigation and the separate investigation into the bank's auto finance servicing activities. The bank has pledged to work with the bureau's supervisory division to develop and implement plans to redress customers who have not yet been made whole.